Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Time To Pay The Piper

Sorry for the long gap between posts. As I noted earlier, my job responsibilities are taking all of my free time. Also, Liberals tend to keep going in circles, rehashing and constantly bringing up the same tired issues over and over again. You would think by now that they would get dizzy from constantly going around in circles, and tired of berating the dead issues like Bush Lied, Global Warming, Bush is Responsible for everything wrong thats happening, etc etc etc. So essentially, there has not been too much new news to report on, and I hate rehashing points of interest endlessly.

Anyway, today we find ourselves in a precarious situation as far as our energy needs and supply. We can thank the Liberals way back when they started to get a foot hold in the 1960's, to some extent big business forcing Congresses hand, and to peoples generally selfish attitude. We have no one to blame but ourselves. For a majority of the country, we allowed this Liberalisim to fester and grow and affect our common sense when making critical decisions. Today we have this twisted sense of what we think we need because thats what we've been programmed for decades to believe. I remember when I was young that my grandparents home, and many businesses in their town, were heated by coal. Good old American coal. I recall the ash man stopping by twice a week to collect the ashes grandpa placed at the curb. These were not simply dumped in a landfill, they were stored and used in the winter time on icy slippery roads like we use sand today. Coal was abundant, and it was cheap, and it still is if we get our common sense back. But in the early sixties, I clearly recall the push towards the use of oil. I knew then that this was a huge mistake. I knew then that this oil was readily available and cheap because of the oil wells being opened up in the middle east. I knew this would definitely be trouble. I recall thinking, why in the hell would we want to be sending our money over to some foreigner, buying their oil when we have plenty of resources in the form of coal right here. I firmly thought then that we should strive to be self sufficient, and I still feel that way today.

If one does their research though, they will find out why this big push really happened. Liberals. On one front we had the beginnings of the enviromental zealots who constantly complained about the acid rain and sulfer being spewed into the air from coal buring facilities, and the perils of strip mining, and everything under the sun. Every home, they would say, is contributing to the problem. On the other hand we had the touchey feeley idiots in Congress that though it would be a great idea to set up trade with the Saudi's and other countries in order to move towards a global economy. Basically, in laymens terms, we wanted to appease them and buy their friendship, so we agreed to jeopardize our national security and enter into a contract that would send us on the path we find ourselves on today. So all through the sixties there was this huge campaign to switch to oil, its cleaner burning and plentiful they would claim. I recall every business in town had a switch to oil sticker in the window. Thousands of homes and business heating systems were converted to oil as a result of that campaign. This was only one front and only a beginning.

Now lets talk about traffic and our highways. Thanks to yet another Democrat and a Congress that lost its common sense, and in all likelyhood was being coerced by big unions and big business, the National Interstate Highway act was suggested and put into place with little opposition by the Eisenhower administration. This served to do two of the most deterimental things that could happen to a countries infastructure. First, it further decimated the railroad infastructure, a topic which I've written about before. Railroads were and still are the most efficient means of moving goods and people, period. But this success, and the fact that at the time railroads were huge privately owned entities, caused resentment to be rampant, and instead of being properly supported by tax breaks and subsidies, railroads were punished, by high taxes, poor government subsidies, and subjected to the Interstate Commerce Commission who fought them at every turn, and did the most to run them into the ground. Second, as this was happening, interestate highways and trucking industries were being heavily supported, promoted and subsidized. So in this same basic time period of the early sixties we have another push from self sufficient and practical, to wasteful and inefficient. This makes no sense what so ever. Liberals and supporters of the Interstate System and Trucking Industries over the railroads are quick to point out that the railroads became inefficient, undependable and had fallen out of favor by the general public. On the surface this, to the gullable, would seem to be true. But the few smart readers would see through this smoke screen and find the truth. Yes, the railroads were becoming less efficient and less dependable. It was not their fault, it was the US Governments' fault, and you can bet your ass that the special interest trucking industry and its unions had a huge hand in the power play. The Interstate Commerce commission denied the railroads the ability to set their prices so as to afford a decent profit so they could run their business efficiently and pay for repairs to track and equipment. This caused the continuous decline and the continued deterioration of the railroad infastructure, which was already in poor condition due to the war, and the finger pointing started as per the plan. Shippers grew tired of the delays and missed shipments, and foolishly switched to inefficient trucks per the plan. Passenger service was affected the same way. Railroads could not keep up with the service and oppulance they had offered before the war. People would not ride in delapidated outdated equipment. They would not tollerate the delays and inconevnience. This, with the normal competition the railroads encountered by cars and air travel caused the riders to flee to other means of transportation. As a result, today we have huge fuel shortages, we have inefficient dangerous trucks plying the highways burning fuel in unmeasurable amounts on a daily basis, and we have millions upon millions of homes that could and should be heated by American coal that are instead burning oil or gas thats imported from abroad. We have tons of freight being moved one contaiiner at a time using wasteful inefficient trucks, while our railroads that can move multiple containers of goods with one engine sit almost completely idle. Lastly we come to the people and their general attitudes. People today are not taught self sufficiency, hard work, common sense, or restraint just to name a few. Today we have billions of idiots who expect everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. We have kids who don't know the meaning of hard work. We have unions who know how to do nothing but stomp and cry about how much their members aren't getting paid enough when they are already way over paid. We have billions of idiots out there who lack an ounce of common sense and will actually buy these large cars, SUV's and pick up trucks. Then they will have the gall to bitch and complain that they have a right to cheap gas. HA! Its laughable at best. People are selfish, period. Today its all about them, and things are getting worse by the day. They keep demanding their cheap gas, and they keep buying gas guzzlers like its their right. Wake up!

So all in all everyone has played a part in getting us to where we are today. Selfishness, greed, and a total lack of common sense are what rules our society today. What needs to happen will not happen and cannot happen without a huge attitude adjustment. I say bring it on! People need to start using common sense and knock off with the entitlement and materialisim crap. Buy a fuel efficient car, learn how to say NO, especially to the kids when they start begging for cell phones, new clothes and a car at the age of 16. Make them work for their stuff, and do without the nonsense crap. The big business', and especially the unions need to knock off with their bullcrap. If your workers want to get $40 an hour it should be because they went to colledge and got an education and landed a real job that pays that kind of money. Not because your illiterate truck driver is only making $28 an hour, when he is only worth $10 an hour, and you want them to be at $38 an hour so they can "survive" or "support their family", and because the company CEO is making more than that. Earn your damn raise, and start living within your means hymies. We need to get off this dependency on anything and everything foreign. Its OK to enter into trade agreements, but not if we cannot do without the goods if we had to, and not if it causes an imbalance in the economy. Anything else is just plain stupid. Also, lets not worry about the damn birdies, and the fishies and the air. They have survived for thousands of years without your Liberal interferance, so bug out and leave us do what we need to do as a country. Converting back to coal would be a good start. We have plenty of it as a natural resource. But we also need to get a force together like the one that worked on the A bomb. We need a group of super scientists to get together and invent the next form of energy for the US. Then we tell these foreign countried to shove their fossil fuels up their collective asses. We also need to get back to common sense basics, and stop with the idiotic decisions. Lets get the trucks off of the highways, and get the railroads back into the business of moving the nations freight and people. The railroads are the most efficient means of moving goods and people, and people are just going to have to bone the hell up and relaise that and use them. Stop this downward spiral now. Getting the trucks off of the highways will save billions of gallons of fuel a month in this country. It will also save every municipality in every state billions of dollars that they currently waste repairing the highway infastructure that is destroyed by trucks, and not paid for by them. It will also result in a huge boost in the safety of our highways as these big rigs are nothing short of lethal in all respects. This would be one of the biggest and most rewarding things this country could do as a nation is eliminate the big trucks, and rebuild the railroad infastructure. Next would be to tell the Liberals to bug off and let industry do what its needs to do to safeguard this country and then find alternatives that will help to resolve this problem once and for all. Until then, all of these stupid decisions are now coming back to bite us in the ass, and its time to pay the piper. I'm so glad I bought a 30+ mpg Hondas......

Friday, August 12, 2005

What Would Jesus Do?

I personally have no problem with people being faithful and religious if they so choose. I also think that its good to try ones best to follow the examples of their religions leader be it Jesus, Buddah, or Allah et al. What I have a problem with are these anti-war zealots who toss out these one sided comments that they are a Christian for example, and to be God like we should practice tollerance, love, forgiveness, and acceptance because thats is what Jesus, Buddah, and maybe Allah would do. They miss one important point. When Jesus came across a sinner, say a thief or murderer, he would react in two different ways depending on what said thief or murderer did. If they were repentant and asked for forgiveness, then he would understand, forgive, and be tollerant of past actions. If the thief or murderer was not repentant, he would have no problem in tossing them into hell. So much for tollerance and forgiveness.

People today should be expected to act no differently if they were following a religious example to guide them through life. If Osama or any other murderer came forth and expressed true remorse for his actions and begged for forgiveness, then I can see these extreme religious followers to asking for us to be tollerant and possibly forgive him. But this is not the case. What we have is continual recruiting, threats, and murderous actions. He should therefore be cast into the bowels of hell by any and all means possible. So the point is, is that Jesus or Allah or Buddah etc were not 100% tollerant, forgiving, or accepting all of the time, and neither should we be expected to be.

As for Cindy Sheehan, she needs to get a life. She is not the only mom who lost a son, and she has no business making an ass of herself with her sit in at the presidents ranch. Now she has all of these "we have no damn life either" Liberal idiot groups clamering to join her with their bullcrap anti-war, anti-Bush rhetoric. Its so easy today to expose the communists and losers in our society, just look for an anti-Bush protest and they will be there in droves. So Cindy, get over it, your son VOLUNTEERED, and he did his duty, and he died for his country. Why don't you try sending a message that you are proud that your son died defending his country, and that you support the other troops and entities who are fighting to eliminate terrorists around the world and keep us safe, instead of being a pathetic disgrace to your sons legacy and a disgrace to your country. People like you make me sick.

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Go Tony!

If you have even one ounce of commonse sense, you have to love Tony Blair. I am in 100% agreement with his poisition that Islamic radicals must be banned and/or deported. Radical clerics, and other murderous factions must be hunted down, identified and eliminated. This is the only way to thwart the growing trend of the gullable muslims and other believers in Islam moving to the ranks of the murderous radical zealots. This type of pro-active position should be adopted world wide, particlarly in countries who have been targeted by these jerks.

Immediately the so called Human Rights idiots started with their screaming and rhetoric, and Tony was ready for them and stated that if they tried their games, then we'll change the laws, but we will be protected by what ever means works. YES! We should only wish that the powers that be in this country would have enough balls to do the same. Its needs to be done, and should be done. This constant crap about rights violations is just that, crap. The government of this country has a duty to protect the welfare of its citizens. If that means they must make rules that govern how people act and control where they can and connot go, the thats the way its happens and its too damn bad if it hurts their widdle feelings. We all have God given rights, but we cannot impose our right on someone else in such a way that it infringes on the rights of another. I have a right to be safe in my country and in my home, and if that means we search bags, or set up some other sort of security, then thats what happens. The same goes with this so called profiling nonsense these Liberals are abusing these days. You know these murderes are almost always middle esatern men, then you look harder at middle eastern men. Its not illegal profiling, its called criminal profiling. When you have a robbery and the perp is black you don't have police running all over town looking for whites or hispanics. You have them looking for a black man. This is exactly the same. You have 16 middle eastern men murder thousands, you are recieving threats from middle eastern radicals, you go after middle eastern people until the problem is resolved. Period.

I've been thinking about something quite interesting. The ACLU is a communist organization who's main goal is really to violate all of our rights, particilarly those of Christians. Typically, lawyers are of a particular faith, and I was wondering how many ACLU attorneys were Christians?

Wednesday, August 03, 2005

Another ACLU Legal (Lie) Argument Exposed

This blogpost is about these ignorant commies who continue to attack the Boy Scouts. In an article on the Fox News web page,,2933,164547,00.html they are demanding that the Scouts stop accepting any funding from any government or public entity. They claim that its all just a matter of some fine line they seem to have drawn which distinguishes between a public entity and a private entity, and what the law allegedly allows each type of entity to do, specifically ban gays, support godliness etc. The Scouts are a moral God fearing entity who have chosen to ban gays and females from their ranks, and to promote good behaviour and godliness, thus they are the subject of constant attack from these Liberals. But these Liberals like Ifeminists and ACLU etc cannot stand those values. They absolutely must have things their way, and no one is allowed to make their own rules, so the Scouts must be stopped at all costs. Crap! What these Liberals need to do, besides go screw themselves, is to get a life and stop with the lying. What these commies keep saying is, is that if the Scouts are a public entity that they cannot ban gays, females, or promote God. They on the other hand claim that if they are defined as a private entity, that they are forbidden to recieve "public funding". They are caliming therefore that when the military allows the Boy Scouts to use a base for their Jamboree or other similar offerings, that these actions are actual "public funding" and are prohibited. The ACLU and other entities are making the argument that as defined, a Public Entity is: "of or pertaining to the people; belonging to the peopleā€¦opposed to private." A public place or organization is typically tax-funded or subsidized, and no one individual has a right to greater access than any other. National parks are an example. They also claim that officially, as defined, a Private Entity is: "not available for public use, control, or participationā€¦Belonging to a particular person or persons, as opposed to the public or the government." A private place or organization receives no public funding; people become members through invitation or through policies defined by the owners. Your living room is an example. NOTE: It is THEIR words: "A private place or organization recieves no public funding.", not those of their given source! I cannot find anything, anywhere, that says that legally a public government entity cannot fund a private organizations event or anything else they legally chose to do.

So, with this I decided to do some more in depth research. I did not have to look far. What I did find out was very interesting, and so pathetic its laughable, but all too typical of Liberal spin and lies. In this article the reader will note that the words "Public" and "Private" are highlighted in red. If the reader were to click on those highlighted words they will find that they are hyper links that will take them to these Liberals' so called legal resource for their argument. Its a frigging dictionary. They selectively quoted these descriptions of "Public" and "Private" from the multiple descriptive lines in an on line dictionary. What a crock of crap. The most important thing, there was something that they oh so conveniently left out of their descriptive of "Private". If we look at the descriptive on the on line dictionary for the word "Private", and pay close attention to the different descriptives, we see some that were used in their argument. But in descriptive #4 line C there is the following: Conducted and supported primarily by individuals or groups not affiliated with governmental agencies or corporations: a private college; a private sanatorium. Primarily is the key word here. It means in many cases, but more importantly it does not mean NEVER. Secondly, and an even more important point, is that a dictionary descriptive is not legally binding. So basically the ACLU and Ifeminists are full of crap, and are ramping up negative and untruthful spin in order to attack the Boy Scouts whom they dispise and hate. We all must do all we can to stand up for the Scouts, expose these Liberals for what they are and what they are doing, and help them so they can continue to accept donations from any entity public or private that they so chose, because its LEGAL!

Get Your Brown Shoe Polish Out Boys

I for one am sick and fed-up tired of black people using their race as an excuse because they are stupid and cannot cut the mustard on their own. I am more mad at our state for caving into these racists and agreeing to pay over a million dollars to past applicants to the Delaware State police and who FAILED and just happened to be black. They also agreed to hire 12 black officers. You are a bunch of spinless wimps. In this entire article as printed in todays paper, not one word of proof was offered to show how the state police used testing bias towards blacks. ALL applicants were given the same damn test, where is the bias in that?? One past applicant from Bear stated that he was forced to think outside of his culture. Huh?? What the hell does that mean? Is he meaning to say that they should ony ask him black related questions? Thats crap of the highest order. Even more ironic, in the article, he says he cannot recall anything specific. So I guess your not that traumatized then huh? They demanded that the pass/fail threshold which was set years ago and used for ALL applicants was unfair and set too high. So let me get this straight, we have a bunch of illiterate blacks who cannot cut the mustard on the test, so we now have to lower the standards so more of them can pass? Bullcrap, go take a reading and speaking class and get some culture you lazy racist a-holes.