Thursday, June 30, 2005

Ears Closed, Eyes Wide Shut

First off I'd like to say thanks to our most pathetic president of all time, Jimmy Carter. Thanks to you, you hapless appeaser idiot, we now have a terrorist as president of Iran. A country you handed to the terrorist during your term, by your pathetic appeasements that allowed the Shaw to be overthrown by terrorists, and turn the country into a serious problem.

On to the main story, the presidents speach on Iraq. I watched the presidents speach and found that in a nutshell it was basically a rehash of his previous positions on the matter of the Iraq war. We must fight terrorisim where it thrives, and we must stay the course. I know this because the last several times he has had to waste his time repeating them, I was able to listen and comprehend what was being said. Liberals must have a serious problem with listening and comprehension, and deciphering what they are seeing and hearing. They continue to harp endlessly on falsehoods, inuendo, and Liberal left lies in vain attempts to discredit the president and the war effort. In their blindness, they say assnine things that tick me off to no end such as "Iraq has nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden", and "Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11'. BULL! Iraq has everything to do with Osama Bin Laden and 9/11 and terrorisim. These Liberals are naieve enough to think that we are stupid enough to believe otherwise? I'd be willing to bet my dollar that if good old liar Bill Clinton were in office that this war would be the best thing since sliced bread, and it would be all about 9/11 and fighting terrorisim, IF we would even be at war seeing that Clinton was a spineless appeaser too. In clear and concise terms, Iraq was a terrorist regeme, terrorists align with terrorists and terrorisim. Any link with terrorisim in any way, is a link to terrorisims leaders, namely Osama Bin Laden and Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi. If anyone does not agree with that fact they are a serious moron plain and simple. Further, in fighting the terrorists, and using their resources to fight in a war in Iraq, it lessens the likleyhood of another 9/11 type of attack happening here on US Soil. It does not eliminate the possibility, but it helps greatly in lessening the likelyhood of another attack. So there are the obvious links for you Liberals jackals who continue to harp about there being no connection between the three. Your wrong as usual. Stop wasting our time trying to discredit the president and this much needed war. Stop with the spineless rhetoric, and crying about 1753 dead and thousands more wounded. Stop with the lies about pre-war intentions, and stop with the insinuations of lies by the leadership. The casualties are so small in number compared to Vietnam and WW2 that its hard to make a comparison. We have done an outstanding job of keeping casualties down, try praising that instead of using that and the dead to propagandize your commie causes. One memo about a topic that was talked about before the war is not proof of an agenda, it simply means our secretary of state would like to know how our allies felt about Saddam and keeping him in power or removing him. You can harp about lies all you want, but the only ones that are factual lies are the Liberal lies about this whole issue. You twist words, you make up stories, and you corrupt facts to fit your version of things, and when questioned you resort to cussing, and tantrum throwing. Liberals need to grow up, and stop wasting our time and resources instead of pouting like a bunch of loser sissys. Liberals also have the audacity to stand there and criticize the president for poor planning. They accuse him of not planning well enough for the aftermath of the initial offensive. They say he did not plan well enough for the insurgancy. Who in the hell can plan accurately for an event like a war? Listen to how assnine those statement are. Are we to believe that the president and his staff should have known exactly how each offensive would play out, exactly how many insurgents would actually come into play, exactly how the insurgents would operate from week to week including their various murderous tactics? Is this what the administration was expected to do? You've got to be kidding me! Now they continue with this bullcrap line of improbable requests, and constantly demand completion dates? So were also to believe that the president and his staff can accurately predict exactly when the Iraqi police, army, and security forces will be fully at the ready and the insurgancy will give up or be defeated? Nonesense. These damn Liberals get more rediculous each and every day. Anyone who does not see that as fact is a Liberal hymie of the highest order themselves.

Lastly comes Joseph Biden. Another pathetic waste of sperm in my opinion, had announced his possible intentions of running for president in 2008. The announcement was all full of maybes, but then within a week we have a PAC formed in his name called. Unite Our States. Please, spare me. First of all he's already lying about his intentions. Why form a PAC if your not sure your even running? We cannot Unite Our States if the Liberals and commie entities such as ACLU continue to drive wedges between every issue they do not support causing demographics to become fractured. As is typical, anything Liberals and their ilk do is destructive in the name of being constructive. They claim that this PAC site will help determine if this idea is a good one or ends in failure. Save yourself the expense Joe, I can confirm your aleady a failure, as a Liberal senator, as a representative of this state, and as a human being.

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

A Disgrace

Its a sickening disgrace that even the Supreme Court of this country have been corrupted by the Liberal Left and their twisted agenda. Yesterday these so called justices, and there is nothing just about them, had a huge chance to do what was right, and correctly interperate the Constitution of this country as it was written. But instead, again, they decided to make new law from the bench. They voted, incorrectly again, to basically ban religious displays from court houses and other government areas. Again, the anti-religious zealots sung praises that these justices adheared to the imaginary seperation clause. Yes, the one that does NOT exist in the Constitution. The justices decided that "Congress Shall Make No Law" is equal to "People Shall Not Display Anything Religious On Government Properties." Wrong again a-holes. Thanks for violating the rights of millions of people to appease the corrupt few. This is so sickening. The big question is how the hell do you sue or abolish the Supreme Court and its justices? Something of this magnatude is what must happen for this corruption to end. The Liberals have known this for years and have slowly and patiently infiltrated our government, and our judiciary and filled these positions of power and that are untouchable with their commie ilk. Now they are meticulously, piece by piece, decision, by corrupt decision picking apart our constitution, and violating our rights. Either the people need another revolution, or we can take a wake up call. If we accept the wake up call we will need to make sure that no further appointments of Liberals Leftists to the supreme court takes place. There is going to be one position opening soon, and possibly another there after. We all must do everything we can to ensure that conservative, patriotic level headed justices are put into place or we are in deep deep trouble.

Yesterday, I saw a post on another blog that echoed exactly what I have been saying for years, and had repeated in my above writing. The communists could not defeat this country by invasion or military means, so they decided to find a better way. They have done that, and that solution is to destroy us from within. Back in 1963 a report was given to Congress that outlined the why and more interesting the how of a communist invasion and take over of the USA from within. Print the following out and read it. Check off each item thats actually happened, and when your finished, you'll see how far the Communists have gotten to their goal. Its alarming.

Then there is the 45 goals of the Communist Party in the US as described and outlined in the Congressional Record of January 10, 1963. These items were excerpted from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen.

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike

It seems that the biggest advocate of these priciples has been the ACLU. They have captured one of the political parties. Liberals make up the bulk of the over 400,000 + membership. Why? Because liberals are easily influenced by words such as civil liberties. And the liberal party in the US is the Dumocraps. And what kind of proof do I need? Howard "YeeeHaaaw!" Dean is the Chairman of the DNC.

The facts of this organization are that they have no respect for the values that made America great. From its founding 85 years ago by 2 self-proclaimed Communists with ties to over 300 Communist front organizations to their full filling of the 10 Platforms outlined by Karl Marx.

Take a look at the 45 items read into the Congressional record on January 10, 1963. Of those items, how many have been championed by the ACLU? The answer is most of them. And those on the left still continue to defend this organization. Why? Ignorance... there is no other word for it.

Monday, June 27, 2005

Order Some Dunce Caps

Did you ever notice how slow Liberals are when it comes to real and true problems that need to be addressed? I've been driving now for 31 years. Driving in Delaware and surrounding states petrifies me. Each and every day its road moron after road moron. Running lights, running stop signs, passing on the shoulder at highway speed, driving up the shoulder, failure to signal, failure to yield, crawling up someone ass, illegal passing, crossing the center line or white shoulder/lane lines, illegal turns, and last but by no means least, speeding. These inconsiderate morons don't understand english? This type of selfish ignorant crap has been going on for decades. Ironically, in todays News Urinal, there is a front page article entitled, "Speeding becoming a serious problem." NO!!! Ya think!? Where have these idiots been? Speeding along with a ton of other traffic offenses IS ALREADY a problem. Speeding and a boat load of other illegal actions have been occuring with alarming regularity for decades! So now they are just starting to notice that selfish ignorant morons are speeding? Do they also see the other serious problems occuring on a daily basis? Why is it that the Liberal media are so slow to acknowledge real problems? I think I know why. Because they are afraid that local government will actually take action, and give the police more powers to do their jobs. Liberals are terrified of authority. That is unless they are the authority. They pick on speeding thinking its simple to step up patrols and, as mentioned in the article, have police stop with the X miles over rule that we all know is there, but the police deny exists. This is where police would normally not pull a driver over and ticket them if they were only going a few miles over the posted limit. Well, this, as with most Liberals hairbrained ideas, will not work. They, as always, try the approach with as little impact, and as much appeasement as possible. I think the police should not waste their time ticketing drivers for 5 mph over or 2 mph over, and go after the freaks going 25 mph over, and passing on the shoulder. The problem is, these drivers are sharp, and they know they can get away with what they do because the police are limited in numbers and in power. The police need to be given more powers, and more advanced means of traffic control. Something like police hiding on side roads accessing a problem streatch of road so they are out of sight. This way the road moron going 87 in a 60 zone and passing on the shoulder will not see the police, and have a chance to correct his/her actions before the police can catch them. While these police sit in the wings, a chopper is in the air and watching the eratic and illegal movements of a driver, identify the vehicle and radio to the hiding police. The police then come out of hiding, suprising and catching the real offendors. When I lived in Florida, police in a small town used a tactic similar to this, and it was quite effective. They would place officers in several successive side streets in wait. These side streets were heavily surrounded by shrubbery so that a driver could not see the police as they sped along. In the first side street an officer would suddenly jump out onto the sidewalk holding a radar gun and get their reading before the driver knew what happened. They instantly radio to the other officers the offending car, and they step out and pull the driver onto the side street and write the ticket. They allowed 5 mph over, but they caught a LOT of idiots speeding. Similar monitoring could be done at problem intersections where these road morons run lights and stop signs all the time, and start writing tickets. But I feel that the Liberals are afraid that this would give the police a little too much rope for their liking. As we've seen today, they will pressure police a little to start with a zero tollerance policy, which will do not thing to stop the real criminal drivers, but it will cause a hardship for the average Joe who is just plodding along trying to get to his/her minimum wage job. So, as usual, the Liberals would have an idea that sounds OK, but lacks in smarts. This, in traditional Liberal fashion, will be implemented wrongly which will cost innocents money, and not resolve the real problem. Its the Liberal way.

Friday, June 24, 2005

Prime Examples

We went from famine to feast over night here as far as subject matter is concerned. All of todays comments are regarding Liberals and what they do best.

First is this joke of a decision by the LIBERAL justices on the supreme court that will violate land and home owners rights across the nation. They have ruled that a municipality/city or similar such government entity can take your land and/or home if they deem that its use in a different manner would be of benefit to the community. So much for eminent domain and homeowners rights. Now all we need are the crooked politicians to trump up bullcrap reasons and grandoise tales of how any property should be taken as changing its use would benefit the community. Special interests will be having a field day with their new land grab powers. All they have to do is butter the bread of their political pals and have them work their magic, and the land is theirs. This brings up my question for the day. Where now are the Liberals and their screaming about a persons civil rights? Where is their outrage at this legalized land grab by the rich developers and investors? There is NONE, and you know why, because this was Liberals at work. Do you think they would have sat still if some Republican city official suggested legislation that allowed the forceful taking of a persons land? Do you think they would have sat still in silence if conservatives came up with this idea, or how about the Bush administration? Hell yes we would have heard every cry manageable. But the silence is deafening.

Lets comment on Karl Rove. This is a very revealing incident. Karl speaks the truth on this subject of how Liberals reacted to 9/11 vs how conservatives reacted to 9/11. He is 100% correct in what he said in that Liberals wanted to appease and litigate, while the conservatives wanted to kick butt. Whats interesting is how many Democrats jumped up and started spouting off about being outraged by Mr. Roves' statment. So are they admitting that they are indeed Liberals? Mr Rove addressed only Liberals, not Democrats. So either we must conclude that Democrats are indeed Liberals, or they are stupid idiots. In any event, there is nothing to be outraged about when someone is speaking the truth as Mr Rove did. He did not come out and defame the military, or the people who died on 9/11 like Durbin did. Durbins coments were insulting, untruthful, and wrong. Thats your outrage. But as usual Liberals and Democrats saw nothing wrong in Durbins comments, but had a huge problem with the truth. As a result, unlike their reaction, or lack thereof, regarding a real issue, they now start acting like two year olds with their demands of an apology and resignation crap over a comment that was based on truth and fact.

Lastly, I have to comment on the editors comments in todays paper which were typically Liberal and revealing as to where they really stand. They had sharp criticism for the amendment thats moving forward regarding the desicration of the flag. In typical Liberal fashion they use the old and unapplicable argument that this amendment if passed would be a supression of an individuals right to free speach. Bullcrap. This is not about free speach. This is all about having some respect for the symbols of your country. People today, many of which are Liberals, have a serious lack of respect for anyone and anything they deem fit to violate. When called out on their ignorant, selfish, and disrespectful actions, they start with the crying about freedom of speach. Basically there is a fine line between assult and freedom of speach. You cannot abuse one right to violate those of another a-holes! That is what this is all about. When you assult the flag by desecrating it, you insult and threaten those soldiers you love to use as a tool by saying they fought so you could have a right to desecrate that flag. Bullcrap. You not only insult them, what they did, what they stood for, but you insult every person in this country. Then you have the gall to call this freedom of speach. No, its an assult, and its wrong.

Thursday, June 23, 2005

Like Lost Children

Did you ever notice that Liberals and Democrats are like lost children? It must be summer, as things have been pretty slow lately, and I've not really had a hot subject to write about unless I started to rehash issues I've already set straight in previous blog posts. So, until a really new and truly hot issue surfaces, things may get a little quiet around here. One thing that bugs me is repeating the same thing over and over again. My mom did that when we were kids. She'd say her piece, and then proceed to repeat it to make sure we got the message and justify what she said the first time around. When she was done, she started all over again until we finally just politely left or yelled for mom to stop! So I've been going over the news the last few days and looking for a good subject to write about such as someones rights being violated, or some assnine law being enacted, or some infantile protest that was happening that was suported by Liberals or Democrats, and all I've found is the same old rehashed crap coming around for another turn at the whipping post. Why are Liberals and Democrats so pathetic? At least my mom was just trying to make sure she was understood. But Liberals and Democrats do this crap to continue to stir the pot. Like this is going to magically change their wrong way into the right way. Sorry, its not going to work. They keep rehasing the non-existant torture issue at Gitmo. Each time the regurgitate this story they come up with more vile adjectives and more flagrant bullcrap in hopes of shocking people into thinking their way. Frankly, all it does is tick normal people off, and they end up alienating themselves further. This can be a good thing however. They also continue to stall in voting for the presidents appointees, be they for the UN abassador or a judgeship. They also stall and come up with nothing in regards to the issues that face our nation such as the Social Security problem. Its the same rhetoric over and over again. With the UN appontee, its we want the papers or we're not voting. Please. How infantile can you get? They're like unions, they're going to stomp their feet and cry like a bunch of sissies unless they get what they want.

Today I read with a groan, an article where they are still persuing the election issue. Look, you lost your butts in Florida in 2000, and you lost your butts in Ohio in 2004, get over it. They insist on picking, and investgating, and constantly bringing up this dead issue. All they ever come up with is some racist ploy about disenfranchisement of blacks and the poor. CRAP! They also keep bringing up fodder about the 2008 presidential run. Oh, Biden is going to run, but he may back out. Hilliary will run, but no she's not committing. Who cares! If either of those two Liberals get in the running this country is in deep deep trouble. I don't want to think about that right now, we all just got past two years of Liberal bullcrap antics and lies, and we need a break before our heads explode. Lastly, they continue to pick on the war on terror. They insult our troops, and they trump up lies and exploit simple opinions into what the gullable would believe to be a true and complete story. The latest example is this crock of a memo from the Brittish intelligence agency. Just because Dr Rice talked about ousting Saddam at a dinner, and was attempting to get their angle on the issue, then now its Bush had intended to go to war the whole time crap. What a crock. The Liberals know damn well that Saddam was in the sights of several presidents including Clinton for decades. The only thing W2 did was to see how other countries felt after 9/11 if an opportunity came up to take him out as he had proved time and again his ruthlessness and distain for the US as wel;l as his support for terrorists friends. This was a legitimate concern given the magnitude of 9/11, and very prudent of any president to do after 9/11 given Saddams proven track record. So here we go round and round, round and round, round and round. The same old stories brought up again and again in endless circles of mindless rhetoric by the Liberals and Democrats. Enough is enough. Maybe if these Liberals and Democrats wasted their energy on useful, meaningful, and justifyable causes, we'd see some real progress for mankind and the US.

Monday, June 20, 2005

Just When You Thought You've Heard Everything

Oh.... My.... God. I've never in all my life thought that Decmocrats and Liberals would ever get this pathetic. Splashed all over my local paper is this rediculous article about these British intelligence papers regarding Condoleeza Rice, and the alleged war agenda the administration was supposed to have immediately after 9/11. This is absolutely unbelieveable that Liberals would need to stoop so low as to all but fabricate a bullcrap headline implying Bush had a war agenda from the beginning, from meaningless information such as this. The most glaringly pathetic and assnine thing in the article was this statement from the reporter that in order to protect his source he hand typed the information onto plain paper, and then destroyed the originals? Does he think we are stupid? These leftist idiots just don't learn do they? We've had several articles appear in the media over the last year or so that proved to be complete fabrications and/or outright falsehoods. We've had outright falsification of documents, and we've had unsubstantiated articles published, and now we have a combo of both unsubstantiated data, and falsification of documents that were allegedly honestly destroyed in an attempt to be nice to a source. Please! Do Liberals really think the American people are that stupid, or is this real hard wishful thinking on their part? Then they are going to attempt to make a damaging report against the Bush administration out of inuendo, and a simple dinner conversation where Iraq and regime change was discussed at the same time? Anyone with half a working brain knows that regime change in Iraq was discussed amongst our allies by several presidents before W2, including Democrat Bill Clinton. So now we are to believe that because W2's advisor happens to talk about regime change just after 9/11 its more significant, and has a more sinister meaning behind it than when Clintons people talked about it? I don't think so. Again, this is so much Liberal bull. I hope other Americans are getting quite sick and tired of this trump up a bogus story method thats quickly becoming a favorite MO for the Democrats, Liberal Media and Radical Left. I know I am. They cannot come up with one legitimate bit of information to work with, so they constantly trump up falsehoods to keep the waters churning. Enough is enough. Liberals and the Radical Left need to get a life, and realize that their assnine and idiotic idealology is wrong and not what the good people of this country are looking for.

Our second item of mention today is the laughing stock of an article in todays paper where its announced that Joseph Biden, the biggest Liberal jackal known to man, just behind Ted Kennedy, is contemplating a run for the presidency. What a way to start a week with a scare like that. Biden running is scary enough, but if he shoud actually succeed would be a travesty for this great country. It would be a monumental step backwards to the likes of the Carter administration. Biden is a radical left Liberal Democrat. He has done nothing for the hard working people of Delaware outside of violating their rights, catering to the credit card industry, catering to his touchy feely Liberal watchdog groups, and would do nothing but cater to radical left special interests, and the Liberal agenda if he should be elected. He should not be re-elected Delaware's sentator let alone be given one second of consideration as to the presidency. Be warned people, Joseph Biden is a dangerous man, and should not be voted into any office if you care at all about your freedoms, rights, morals, or about Americas future and safety.

Thursday, June 16, 2005

Add The Adjective Hypocrites

When talking about Democrats, and their lack of any new ideas, lack of an agenda, obstructionisim, negativity, and Liberalisim, we can add hypocrites to the list as well. This is nothing new, and I've called them hypocrites on several occasions. But in recent news it appears that they are getting outright arrogant about it. Come to think of it, lets add arrogant to the list as well. Ok! The first example is this Democratic Convention held in Buffalo that was attended by Hillary Clinton. Just weeks ago, old bitch Hillary called the news media spineless because they dared to report on issues in a manner not to her liking. Namely, they reported some negative things about the old bat and things she said, that happened to be factual truths. So what does our hypocrite air bag senator do, she closes the Buffalo event to the media. There ya go, freedom of the press. But I don't seem to hear the crys of constitutional rights, and the freedom of the press amendment, and how Hillary blatantly violated the medias rights. No, all we hear are crys about the supposed rights of murderers held in a prison camp who were caught killing our innocent civilians. Hillary disagrees with one thing they say about her and they are BANNED.

Now lets turn the scenario around. Lets say the Bush administration tells the press that he will do no more pressers at the White House. Do you think the press will stand for that? Hell no they won't, they would crucify the man. They would beat their breast and chant about their rights and freedom of the press faster than you can fry an egg. They would argue about the public's right to know what the leadership of their country is doing. But old bitch Hillary can just shut them out, and neary a word is said in protest. Second example is this jackal senator Durbin from Illinois. Of course he is a Democrat. Durbin has the gall to stand up during a speech and make statements that compare out military personnel to Nazi's and Gitmo as a Gulag. This ass cannot even come up with something original, he has to use an already unproven statement. So let me get this straight, he can demean our troops, and criticize our countrys efforts in the war on terror, and this is OK, and according to him he does not have to apologize for speaking his mind, yet these ignorant jackals like senator Joe Biden will stand and make a public statement that Gitmo is an embarrassment for American in the eyes of all other nations? I don't think so, I think its traitors like Durbin who are making our country look like a laughing stock to the rest of the world. They are over there laughing at the idiots we voted into office who are making a mockery of our own people. They also have the gall to criticize the president when he accidently tangles or mispronounces a few words, yet this ass humiliates the country and its military, and the media is deaftly silent. Then we have the disgracefull actions by a group of spoiled Liberal brats out in California, who have the gall to interrupt their Governor when he is trying to speak. He has worked so hard to help get that state out of the quagmire the Liberals have gotten the state into, and all he gets in return is chants, snide remarks, banners of protest, and other ungrateful ignorant activity. Those type of persons are a disgrace. They are a disgrace to themselves, their familys, their state, and their country. Their hypocracy and selfishness knows no bounds. Its all, about them. Governor Swarzenegger has a huge mess to clean up out there, and he is wanting the people of that state to let him and the other elected officials know what they want by holding a vote. This is a great idea. The cost is high, but it is the first and important step in a solution to a very difficult problem, and it lets the people speak and get involved. But the Liberals, special interests and union jackals are in an uproar. Their union members who are getting paid four times what they are worth due to union blackmail tactics might have to give that up. These union workers who are getting too many freebie benefits without paying a dime towards the cost might have to get off their asses and actually contribute. Its will be no more gimmie, gimmie, gimmie for the poor little greedy union dolts. I'm real tore up they might actually have to earn what they are really worth and contribute something as opposed to getting paid four times what they are worth and getting a freebie for everything. BooHooHoo. Now they are out there like the little sissys they are, pouting, crying, and acting like a bunch of ignorant shelfish children because they cannot have their way, the wrong selfish greedy union way, any more. Too bad, but thats the wrong way. These people need to have some damn respect for other people, particularly the Governor who has their states best interest in mind. But this all shows the selfish, hypocritical, two faced, arrogance of the Democrats and Liberals in its rawest form. Its sickening, and we must do everything we can to let them know we will not stand for it any longer.

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

He's Poor??

Reporters and especially our Liberal joke of a senator, Joe Biden, must think we are stupid. In todays edition of the News Journal there was a front page article with the headline stating that Senator Carper was rich, while Joe Biden was just an average guy. What? The article went on to list all of Carpers assets such as a farm he just purchased in North Carolina and other land acquisitions, and the related Liability etc. They state that Carper is worth 1.3 Million to 3.5 Million dollars. Then they tell Bidens story and basically say nothing except that he has is worth about $50,000 to $300,000. Again... what? Who are they kidding? I know when I was growing up in the Pike Creek Valley and Limestone hills area of northern Delaware that Joe Biden lived in a town named Hockessin. Today, I believe he lives in Greenville. I'm writing this late because I've just spent several hours attempting to find one ounce of information on either where Biden actually lives specifically. They only list Wilmington, which is a generalization for northern Delaware. I then tried to find something in the county land use databases, and found nothing. My last attempt was to actually read the whole financial disclosure, and see what all was said and see if real estate values were listed. I could not find anything on any senator in regards to their financial disclosures. I find this irritating and disturbing. I can tell you that if Biden still lives in Hockessin, his home alone would be in the half million to 1 million dollar or more range to start. If I am correct in that he now resides in Greenville, the posh-est area in the county, home to corporate executives, politicians, doctors etc., then his home would be worth a minimum of 1 million dollars on up to 3 or 5 million dollars. Real estate in northern Delaware is outrageous, and those two towns are home to the highest values. My modest 2600 square foot home in New Castle is worth $350,000. So, Biden is menaing to tell us that he is worth a maximum of $300,000? If so he is a bald faced liar. He'd have to be driving a 1975 Vega and living in a shack, which is not the case. So this begs the question. He is lying through his teeth about simple financial details, whats he doing on the job and when he speaks publically about the president, Gitmo, the War on Terror, or other issues? As I've said before, Biden needs to go. He is so far left as to be useless and obstructive. Its time for him to go and retire. He now has lost all credibility through his own actions and lies. I think its time for the people of Delaware to vote in someone with integrity, and who is willing to tell the truth and actually make progress on the job. Hopefully a republican......

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

A Lesson Learned?

Maybe, just maybe now that a high profile DA and prosecutor in California has had his butt handed to him, DA's across the country will get past this "we gotta blame someone" thing. Have you ever wonderd why these idiots never admit they made a mistake? Its one huge part of whats wrong with our judicial system. Police, judges and DA's just cannot admit they made a mistake, or let anything they start go because thats simply the right thing to do. In the case of Michael Jackson this is quite evident. It was so obvious that the accusers were nothing more than grifters and money mongers, and more importantly, the evidence in no way supported the charges. Many people disagree with the verdict, I happen to think it was almost dead on. In reading the articles and line by line testimony ad nauseum thats filled our media since this trial began, I came to the following conclusions. First, Michael is a very very strange man. But this is not a against the law. Second, I think he may have served alcohol to minors, but he was not convicted of that. This is the only thing I feel the prosecution proved and should have won. Third, Michael in all of the evidence I read about, never did anything more than have a boner and ask for vaseline or plant a kiss on a kids head. Nothing was shown that proved that he touched kids privates, or placed his privates where they should not be, or asked or forced the boys to touch or do anything to him. So one could only conclude based on the evidence, that he maybe at most taught these young boys how to get self satisfaction. This also is not against the law. Nowhere did anything solid and conclusive come out that put Michael into a position of touching or doing anything that would remotely resemble molestation. So the verdict I am afraid was the right one, and I hope that Michael finally grows up and stops with the childish interactions that made him a target. The DA should have seen that he clearly had a piss poor case and refused to press charges. People do not like Michael because he is wierd. They pick on him relentlessly because he is wierd. They blow everything he does out of proportion, such as him showing the crowd his baby over a balcony. He had full control over that child the whole time and simply held him up for everyone to see. The media went apeshit and immediately started reporting that Michael hung the child over the railing and almost dropped him. No, thats not what happened at all, and its obviously clear from the repeated showings of the film that, that was not what happened. But they go on the attack and blow everything out of proportion just to make Michael look bad because he is a wierdo. This case was no different. It was a needless waste of time and money that should have never happened. We shall see if history continues to repeat itself in regards to DA's in general and especially with Michael Jackson. I hope to see change regarding both.

Monday, June 13, 2005

What Goes Around, Comes Around

Sorry I missed a day in there and my latest writings have been more of my crabbiness than clear message writing. I've been still fighting a congestion in the chest, and a new project at work has all of my time. Anyway, I recieved an initeresting e-mail from a friend that was about a preacher who was asked to say a few words before the start of a state congressional session. Its kind of a prayer, because it sort of started out that way, but more interesting, is that it then goes into pointing out the perils of what Liberalisim has done today to our society. It lists all of the touchey feeley, feel good Liberal things that have been done or put into place in lieu of good old common sense and having a backbone to do the right thing that needs to be done. The list with its opening line is as follows:

'Woe to those who call evil good,' but that is exactly what we have done. We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed our values.

We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery.
We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare.
We have killed our unborn and called it choice.
We have shot abortionists and called it justifiable.
We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building selfesteem.
We have abused power and called it politics.
We have coveted our neighbor's possessions and called it ambition.
We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression.
We have ridiculed the time-honored values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment.

Now that is an eye opener. Its an eye opener not only by what it says, but buy what is said is so true. All of these items that were mentioned were Liberal feel good ideas that they presented, promoted, and got into place in law and/or society in general. So now we have people who have not had to endure an embarrasement, or the pain of failure all in the name of self esteem. We have a generation who has no pride and no shame what so ever. People today are more selfish, have no remorse for doing wrong, and who have no respect for anyone else but themselves. Nowhere is this more prevelant than with our children, and with minorities. Everything that is bad and evil is held up and promoted, while anything and everything that is good is banned and cast aside. Only the silent majority can stop this trend by not being silent any longer. We must act to reverse this trend that is eroding the very core of our society from the inside like a cancer, and eradicate it completely.

Thursday, June 09, 2005

Technology Is Great, If Its Left Alone To Happen

Technology can be one of the coolest things a person can experience. There is nothing like moving forward, trying out new gadgets, and testing the latest gizmo. Humans in general would be a lot farther along today if technology were left alone and allowed to happen without interference from spineless Chicken Little groups.

One of the neatest things to come along in recent years is the ability to pay for your purchase by simply entering a small code and putting your finger on a scanner. Its called BioPay. Its a new technology where by persons register by presenting a confirmed check with proper identification to a participating retailer, and once they are entered into their system, grabbing ahold of a small ball so their fingerprint data can be electronically entered into the system. All of this takes about 2-4 minutes. When your ready to complete your transaction simply enter your code and put a finger on the scanner and your done. I like it!

However, as I've written before in my Blog, there are always some group of idiots with their Liberal sized peabrains who start with the gloom and doom sky is falling crap. In this instance there are "civil libertarians" who baselessly claim that this whole system raises privacy concerns. They claim that this data can be stolen and put the participants at high risk. Ok... like CitiBank loosing a tape of several hundred thousand records in a UPS shipment is any more or less dangerous? If your that much of a squeemish dolt, then don't sign up! Its always some Liberal jackal reading the worse possible scenario into everything thats brought to the table. This is a wonderful and helpful idea, and should be promoted as such. But to sit there like closed minded idiots and complain like the world will come to an end if this technology is allowed to move forward, is just stupid. They also go harping on how this technology will never catch on because people associate fingerprints with crime. Where do these people come from? Who sits there and thinks this unfounded garbage up? Then they try the old maybe this, maybe that scenarios. Maybe this data would be compromised and then what. Exactly, then what? What happenes when a box of checks is stolen or a credit card is stolen? We handle it! This technology will help greatly to reduce those types of crimes from happening in the first place, as its very hard to steal someones fingers. Even if a hacker could get into the computers, there are no actual scans of the fingerprints in there so they could even attempt a James Bond move, and make a fake set of fingerprints out of latex. The computer simply stores some digital data references that are unique to a humans fingerprints, that allow a computer to identify the person.

So as is usual, the nay sayers complaints are unfounded. Hopefully their whining and moaning will not slow down this technology. I hope it spreads like wildfire in a town near me, as I'll be signing up but pronto. As for the Liberal civil libertarians, please get a damn life, and go sit in your plastic bubbles with your hands folded and neatly placed on your laps, and shut up.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

True Face Of The Democratic Party

I must be short again today as my time is short due to the ramping up of projects at work. Today I will mention two incidents in the news media that really start to show the true face of the Democratic Party. First is the idiotic statement by former president Jimmy Carter in calling for the closure of Gitmo. Carter claims that the US has been humiliated in recent days and as a show of good faith for human rights, we should close this base and set the prisoners free. Sorry Carter, you had your chance to do your thing for "human rights" and we saw, and are still suffering, the consequences. In true Democratic form he calls for the US to place its tail between its legs and run for the hills like a bunch of spineless dolts. We should consider doing this just because of some communist group like Amnesty International called us some names, and the ACLU is digging hard for some sort of dirt? Are you saying we should cave in and let terrorists have their freedom in the name of human rights? When are the terrorists who murder innocent people by the hundreds and thousands, and have ramped up the best score board tally of human rights violations around the globe going to be addressed, criticized, and brow beaten? When are you and the other commie "human rights" groups going to go after the terrorists, and humiliate them, and dig up and expose the dirt on them? As is typical, appeasement is the order of the day with Liberals and Democrats. Always more willing to turn tail and run as opposed to putting up a fight which in the long run will end more suffering and human rights violations than if we just tried to appease the terrorists. What am I missing here? I'm not following the logic. OH! Thats it, this is a Democrats stance, there is no logic!

Second, is our old madman pal himself Howard Dean. The more he opens his pie hole the more he exposes the ass the Democratic party really is. Keep on harping Howard about Republicans being an all white christian party. Yeah, then turn around and tell people that the Democratic party is more mature and more fair, and more tollerant and more accepting of diversity. Factually, its those who are screaming the loudest about tollerance, human rights, equality, acceptance, and how the Republicans are not on board with those issues, that are the ones who violate most of those issues' principles while claiming conformity out the other side of their mouths. Its the old kettle calling the kettle black again. I'm glad Dean is their leader and spokesperson. I could think of no one on the planet so well suited to exposing what the Democratic party is all about than Howard 'madman' Dean.

Tuesday, June 07, 2005

Trying To Save Face

I'll be brief today as yesterdays Blog was quite long, and today I am short on time. Today I will comment on an Opinion article by our states Liberal blabbermouth Senator Joe Biden. It appears that the senator is getting a lot of heat about his and his fellow Democrats stonewalling on the vote for John Bolton for UN ambassador. In a nutshell, the Liberals and Democrats are stalling on an up or down vote for this nominee because they are in fear that he may actually get approval. Liberals don't want this because they are in cahoots with members of the UN and this would all go away if we had a real leader in there to set things straight. The only way to ensure that he is not approved is to stall the vote, and delay progress. This, as has been mentioned before, is what the Liberals do best. So here we have Senator Biden mouthing off in an attempt to save face, and as usual, trying real hard to turn the tables and make it look like Bush is the one who is holding up progress. This is not true if your paying attention. Biden attempts to use this bullcrap excuse of blaming the white house for not releasing information on John Boltons' previous job performance. They already are harping on some alleged abuse because the man used intelligence in a way the Liberals and Democrats don't like, so they surmise he must be the wrong man for the job. What I find most interesting is the fact that they insist that the information they are requesting on John Bolton, is information that they say will prove that he abused his powers with previous issues. Wait a minute.... why would they need the information to be released by the administration if they already know what it contains? It seems to me that the administration is 100% correct in that there is nothing more in any personnel files on John Bolton than they already know, and that the Democrats insisting on this information being released as an excuse to hold up the vote, and at the same time finger point to the administration as the hold up, is just more of the Liberal Democrat game playing as usual. So senator Biden, stop with the backpedaling, bullcrap stories, and lies, and start doing some real work instead of holding up progress as usual.

Monday, June 06, 2005

Finding Real Deep Throats

Sorry I am late posting today. This took a long time to write and reasearch facts. Here goes...

Sometimes a written and unfortunately published article is so pathetic and wrong that it makes a person with any amount of common decency want to puke. For me, these invariably end up being Liberal writings that are so slanted and full of half truths, unsubstantiated statements and outright lies. This is not to mention, that they are typically the same old unfounded and unproven rhetoric rehashed again, and again, and again. The article I am writing about and exposing the truth on today, is a Liberal rant written by none other than Bill Press. How this piece of human garbage can write such Liberal garbage and get away with it is truly sad. But it takes a Liberal editor for a Liberal newspaper or magazine to allow it to happen, and so it does.

They do not care weither they are lying or being downright disrespectful to the point of being ignorant not to mention their arrogance. All they have in mind is writing and publishing anything and everything disrespectful and degrading to this country and its current president. Things would be quite different, I am positive, if the current president were a Liberal Democrat, then they could do no wrong. Well, this crap is going to stop here and now.

Bill Press is a pathetic speck of corn on the side of the big turd they call Liberalisim, and for the second time now in my Blog I will set his lies, and him, straight. His pathetic and insulting rant was about Deep Throat. Press dismisses the original Deep Throat as insignificant in todays world, but makes a point to be sure we know that what Deep Throat did was to bring down a "Republican" president and an administration that was wrought with corruption and criminal activity. He conveniently forgets to mention that this had been a problem for several administrations, Democratic administrations, particularly Johnson and Kennedy. But God forbid we attempt to tarnish the image thats Camelot by telling the truth about where the corruption had its roots. Please, spare me. Press rambles on to say that what we really need today is a modern day Deep Throat. Why is this one would ask? Press explains as only a true Liberal could. His first beef is that the current adminstration is the most secrative he has ever seen. This is "scary" and "dangerous" he says. How is that Press? Scary or dangerous in that maybe you'll not be able to expose sensative issues about our national security? Worried that maybe your supply of material to twist into lies is in jeopardy? First of all its none of your damn business knowing every word thats spoken by the president and his administration. You have a right to freedom of the press, but not a right to carte-blanc government access to further your Liberal agenda. I applaud any administration that keeps a lid on information that in the interest of national security and its image should not be released. I applaud any administration who refuses to release information that is not required to be released for any meaningful purpose.

On the other hand, I denounce any publisher and their staff who willingly demean the leadership of this country, wheither they are right or wrong in their decisions. I denounce any publisher and their staff who places our lives in jeopardy so they can sell a story or worse yet, attempt a smear campaign against someone who is actually leading the country, and not catering to the Liberal and Political Correctness cause. So in other words, what information you get is on a need to know basis as it should be. As far as I am concerned, you and your Liberal media cronies don't need to know anything. This will affectively slow down the lies and rhetoric from the Liberals.

Next Press makes a comment that he wants a Deep Throat in the energy department to come forth about the administrations Energy Policy. This is not going to happen because there is nothing to expose except Liberal stonewalling. The president supports funding for Fuel Cell research, he supports drilling in the Alaska wilderness, and he supports the research into alternate fuel sources. Those are the three biggest issues for the administration, and they are excellent ones. If we can get the Liberals to stop with their bleeding heart enviromentalist bullcrap, and let us get to drilling where we know there is oil, and where we own and control the oil fields, then maybe we'll get somewhere. Or do you Liberals want Bush to make a visit or pick up the phone and berate a foreign power into higher oil output quotas? This is not going to happen, should not happen, and the party affiliation of the president will have nothing to do with it not being done.

The Liberals always call for tough measures, but when it comes time to act they show their true spineless, ball less colors. Next Press goes back into the old worn out rhetoric box and pulls out the Weapons of Mass Destruction and the war in Iraq issue. Press again is looking for something that is not there, and that has been proven not to be there. He is looking for a Deep Throat to come out of the blue like a Liberals saving angel, and come up with information that would incriminate the president showing that the whole war was a big scheme trumped up by the current administration as an excuse to go to war. I suppose it was for the oil so thats why our Energy Policy sucks too right Press? You won't find your Deep Throat here either Press because there is none. Its already been proven that the WMD existed and were moved long before the war started because the UN and Liberals, in true Liberal fashion, stalled and dicked around with the decision to go to war so long, that they could have moved the entire country of Iraq away in buckets before they moved their Liberal asses and let us go in there.

The second fact on this matter is this. Any and all decisions were made by the president and high level staff based on intelligence given to them. Not by intellegence anyone made up in their head as part of some scheme. The intellegence at that time said they were there, and the president acted accordingly and went on the offensive. We all know the Liberals would have again taken the passive stance, which in all likelyhood would have lead to another 9/11 like masacre. Was some of that intelligence inaccurate, probably, maybe, who knows, was it deliberate with the intentions of decieving, probably not. But the Liberals are still hoping that there is something here they can latch on to instead of getting a life and moving on. Its also been proven time and again that Iraq and Saddam had direct ties to Al Qaida. Saddam did very well in conceiling his involvement with Al Qaida, this would be expected of a liar and snake like him. But we've found the camps, the papers, the computers, and now like roaches they are exposing themselves daily as they continue to murder almost daily. One would have to be a complete idiot to think that Saddam had no connection with Al Qaida. Hence, Liberals must be complete idiots as they are the only ones who think this way. I suppose Zarqawi who is known to have been in Iraq, and dealing with Saddams regime, is just a figment of our immaginations?

Next Press wants a Deep Throat on John Bolton, the presidents nominee for the UN representative. John Bolton, from what I've read about him, is the right man for the job. He is tough and a no nonsense man who can get in there and get the job done. The Liberals insist on stonewalling, which they are excellent at doing, and they do this by asking for meaningless information that no one has any business asking for. The information would not change anything they already know about John Bolton, but because the administration refuses to let John Bolton be further violated by the press and Liberals in Congress, then the conclusion must be that the administration is covering something up. This is one of the most assnine things I've ever heard in my life. The Liberals are so afraid that this man will actually be approved for the position that they are stooping to new lows. They are so afraid that someone will get in to the UN and clean house, and expose all of their underhanded business dealings, that they will stop at nothing to deny the man a fair vote to confirm or deny his appointment. This is the Liberal way, stonewall, waste time, lie, and stymie progress. Where there is supposed to be a Deep Throat in this as far as the administration goes is beyond me. Where Deep Throat needs to come out of is the UN, and expose the Liberals and their underhanded and illegal games.

Then we come to the Deep Throat of torturing and outsourcing for torture, Iraqi prisoners. This one is almost as laughable as the John Bolton one. Why in the hell would Bush deliberately issue any type of order such as this? He has no reason to do so. The United States has always been at the forefront of human rights. This is not to say that some mistakes have not happened, they have. But just because there are a few people out there to took the opportunity to seek revenge for those innocents who have been murdered by these bastards, does not in any way imply that the administration has deliberately mandated these things to happen. This is another far fetched bullcrap issue that the media in general has been trying to lather up into a big frigging deal in order to again embarass the Bush administration and the country. Its nothing short of treason as far as I am concered to outwardly accuse the administration, and the country of deliberately torturing prisoners, when nothing could be further from the truth. Its a disgrace that the Liberal media are so desperate so as to have to resort to such tactics. Outside of a few isolated incidents that have been promptly addressed, there is no need to continue a witch hunt in an attempt to further embarras the country. There is no hidden madate Press, so give it up.

Next we have Press looking for a Deep Throat in regards to the leaking of the identity of CIA agent Valerie Plame. This again is another tired old Liberal story that they will not leave go to die. The Liberals insist on continuing to regurgitate this issue looking for some mysterious and mischevious deeds perpetrated by the White House. First of all, the president had nothing to do with the leak. Its already been discussed that the leak wasn't even a leak, and its mere mention was an accident, that yes, did happen at a high government level. Someone needs to tell the Liberals that sometimes crap happens, like when they were born. People make mistakes. If no one made a big damn deal out of them, then most of the time they would go un-noticed. But no, this is not good enough for the Liberal media. They have to go blabbing the story all over the damn world trying to make a big deal out of nothing in an attempt to discredit the Bush administration. So again, what is Press looking for, someone to come out of the woodwork and tell them that yes president Bush deliberately planned the demise of a CIA agents career, and endagnered the lives of all of her contacts for absolutely no reason what so ever? The Liberals get more rediculous every time they open their mouths. Its amazing that the only "motive" they seem to want to fit into everything that happens is that the Bush administration is up to some sort of criminal activity. We'll talk about criminal activity by a president in a minute, then we'll know who the real crook was in the White House.

Lastly, Press regurgitates yet another old story that has been disproven time and time again, Bushs' military service. Jesus Christ Press, don't you Liberals hear too well? The man served, he did what he was required to do, and was honerably discharged, get over it. You a-holes even went as far as trumping up some farce of a story with your Liberal dolt Dan Rather, and still could not prove Bush did anything wrong, because he didn't. Liberals insist on rehashing and rehasing the same old disproven stories repeatedly. The Liberal media is so brain dead that it cannot investigate a story and find the true truth. This is becase they are trying so hard to find a story, any story, that fits their pre-concieved Liberal notions that they have to resort to outright lies and fabrication to make one. What a novel idea, cannot find legitimate news, then we'll make our own to suit our agenda. Then they have the gall to stand there and continue to harp endlessly on the same nonsense over and over again while telling us that what they say is the truth. Bullcrap!

There is absolutely NO reason for any media outlet to continue to attempt to look for Deep Throats, hoping to get some deep dark secret about the administration so they can exploit it and demean this country and its leadership. The Deep Throats simply do not exist as they have no valid reason to exist, except in the minds of Liberals who are desperate. Maybe they should take a look back a few years, and they will find all of the true Deep Throat fodder that can handle. In fact there will be so much that they would most likely not run out of topics for many years to come.

Yes, Press, lets look at your old PAL Bill Clinton, the biggest criminal to sit in the White House ever. Here are where your Deep Throats will be, and they abound in numbers. Lets look at a few shall we? Many of these we don't need a Deep Throat, they are already proven, but a Deep Throat would in all likelyhood provide even more damning evidence than we already know about. Lets see, how about the Lewinsky scandal. Talk about appropriate for Deep Throat. We all know about Monica, I'm sure there are many other Deep Throats that had been around the White House that ole Bill plied with his tool. I'm sure his beloved public would like to hear of them. A Deep Throat should come forward and tell us about the Clinton lies ole Bill didn't have to lay on the grand jury if the questions were not supressed. A Deep Throat I am sure can enlighten the public about how many other times ole Bill lied to us besides the "I did not have sex with that woman" whopper or how he cared for the starving mother of 7 from Somolia.

There are probably several Whitewater Deep Throats, and several Travelgate Deep Throats, several Bloodgate Deep Throats, and several FBI Files Deep Throats. I'm sure there are a few Deep Throats in the DNC fund raising arena, and the Democratic pay to play games arena as well. How about we hear from the Deep Throats that have not come forward regarding the mysterious death of White House counsel Vince Forester. Maybe we can hear from the Deep Throats in the Rose Law firm. Maybe White House insider Deep Throats will come forward with more on the manipulation and pardoning of jail terms for ole Bills kin and buddies like Roger Clinton, and Dan Lasater. Maybe we'll at that time have Deep Throat fill us in on why Susan McDougal was passed over for a pardon, while Roger Clinton got a reduced sentence?

So the Liberals had better watch out for what they wish for, they may get more than they bargained for. Their baseless inuendo suggesting the existance of Deep Throats regarding the current administration show clearly their Liberal agenda. Maybe its time they looked into the mirror, and started being honest with themselves and decide to look for the Deep Throats where they are more likely to exist, in the Democratic party.

Friday, June 03, 2005

Human Waste

Hows that for an eye opener title? Well, we're not going to talk about poop or anything, just some Liberals. Now, with that title I could be ready to talk about Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, George Soros, Michael Moore, and a whole host of other Liberal losers. But today we are going to talk about Howard Dean. Yes the head of the DNC, the big loon, the madman. Are Liberals and Democrats really that stupid to think this madman is good for their cause? I just cannot fathom embracing this man for any reason. Yet there they sit and listen to his mad rantings, and non-sense. Then they actually applaud him too! The last example that I recall in recent history where a madman was allowed to rant like Dean does in public, as the leader of a political party, that was able to whip his gullable audience into a frenzy, and had ideals that were just as sick was during the third reich in the form of Adolf Hitler. Dean's MO is strangely similar, and so are that of his followers. More importanly, and the scariest point of all, so are their ideas and goals.

Howard Dean is a danger to this country, and so are the gullable dolts who blindly follow his lead. This is why it is so important for normal conservative people to make sure we make a stand against everything they do and stand for. For to fail to do so will bring the same results as those brought by the third reich, and history shall have repeated itself.

Thursday, June 02, 2005

The Patriot Act

Sorry for missing a few days, I've been really sick with a combo of strep and bronchitis. Before that hit me like a ton of bricks, I was doing some extensive research on the Patriot Act. What would posses me to do such a thing? Well, an editorial in the Delaware Voice column of the News Urinal, our local Liberal propaganda rag, entitled 'Patriot Act raises risk of Policec State'. This of course was meant to do what it did for me, get my attention. GASP! A police state, oh dear oh my.....

In typical Liberal fashion, the author comments on a recent writing and immediately states that the whole Patriot Act should in essence be scrapped. He states that it was written in a hurry in a near state of hysteria right after 9/11 cleverly making sure he does not mention that it was a complete bipartisan effort meaning that the Democrats had everything to do with its creation. But he was sure to attack the "rightest Republicans" and placing blame on them for wanting to grant the FBI unbridled subpoena powers which he called a fortaste of rights abuses. Ok so he now has the attention of the gullable idiots, and maybe a few like me who are waiting to pick this garbage apart with some facts. It is at this point that he shows that he is a true Liberal indeed.

He stops talking about anything the Patriot Act covers, and goes off on a 4 paragraph rant on the war on drugs, and seizures, and how much we spend on the war on drugs and how it was a dismal failure. Like I said, he had my attention, but I was waiting for him to prove his point. I wanted him to quote the parts in the Patriot Act that allegedly give the FBI these unbridled subpoena powers, and point out specifically other evils that would justify that the Patriot Act should be scrapped, and how it was a danger to our civil rights. None were forthcoming. Liberals of course keep harping about how dangerous the Patriot Act is, and how its is supposed to be one of the biggest violations of civil liberties ever written. I'll sum up my feeling on their opinion in one word. Bullshit. Do these morons ever really read anything? Maybe they are hoping they can use their old tricks of partial quotation that makes something sound so bad in hopes that the people have not read this wonderful piece of legislation, and will get all upset about it and join in their cry. Currently, our old PAL's (Thats translated Personal A$$ Lickers.) the American Communist Liberals Union aka The ACLU has filed a lawsuit to have parts of the Patriot Act found unconstitutional. As is typical, these jackals need to get a life. Their biggest beef is allegedly some as yet unnamed clause in the act that allegedly gives the government permission to collect data on individuals without a judge authorized warrant. This is incorrect. Nowhere in the entire Patriot Act does it say that the government has carte-blanc abilities to gather personal information.

What in part it does say for example is this: It clarifies the legal code in several places to include terms related to terrorisim and terrorist activities. IE: if a clause originally said a warrant may be obtained if the authorities had reason to believe that an extortion or other listed crimes were being committed, that list now includes engaging in terror activities. Its that simple. It also expands what crimes the authorities are allowed to investiage, and how. If a clause previously had said burglary, robbery, murder, it now also says planting bombs related to a terrorist act, terror surveilance, and other terror related activities, and the methods now include wire taps and electronic communications surveilance. The difference is that with these new powers its explicitily stated that they must be used within existing legal restraints so as not to violate an individuals rights. (Thats the part the ACLU forgets to mention by the way.) They have also tightened the way in which financial institutions work with unknown clients, and when dealing with large amounts of currency.

However, again, in all new requirements that are given, in ALL instances it is clearly noted that any and all compliance must be done within the constraints of existing civil rights laws. So as is typical, the ACLU and other Liberal trouble making communist entities are screaming wolf, and there are no wolves in the woods. They are trying to use their old scare tactics to mislead people into believing that their rights are being seriously violated, when the exact opposite is true. The Patriot Act is there to help further protect us, and to give our authorities permission to investigate terror activities more readily. I've read this document, and it is quite large, several times, and nowhere in its contents can I find the section where the government is given permission to gather information on any individual in any manner that would violate their rights without their permission, or without the proper due process. The Patriot Act should and must be renewed in its entirety, and even expanded upon to include items that were not known at the time of the original documents writing.