Friday, April 29, 2005

How Low Can They Go?

Liberals I mean, what else is there? It appears that they have no shame what so ever either, besides having little or no respect for anyone but themselves. Yet they will typically be the first ones tossing the "appalled" word around at the littlest of things that are said and done by people. They chopped down a tree today and ran over a frog in the process making his eyes pop out to make room for the new home to be built..... the Liberal tree huggers and frog kissers are "appalled". That example is so typical. The opposite side of the spectrum is this example, 2800+ innocent people were murdered today by Islamic radical jackal murderers..... the Liberals simply say we must have done something to tick them off. My god they are so pathetic its sickening. What am I getting at in todays writing, I'll tell you. There is a Liberal jackal of the hugest proportions, a former CNN reporter. (That should give you a huge hint as to where this a-hole is coming from.) Who is now a University of Delaware professor. What this jackal has done is file a law suit against the military to have photos of the remains of those who were killed in action released to him and his cronies. This is the most heartless, self centered, and pathetic outrage I've read about in a long frigging time. There is absolutely NO reason for anyone to have access to any of those photos. Having them will serve absolutely NO good purpose what so ever. But this Liberal SOB claims that it is a service to the families to have the photos in public, that its disrespectful not to have them displayed. How do you figure?? This is just more Liberal lies. How is rubbing the death of those who served our country in the faces of the general public, and more importantly, their families in any way respectful? Its not! There is absolutely NO reason to have those photos displayed, none, so its obvious that this jackal has an agenda. What he is clearly doing is looking for anything that he and his Liberal buddies can use as a tool to show how horrible (Gasp!) the war is, and that its all George W Bush's fault that innocent people are dying needlessly yadda, yadda, yadda. The same old tired worn out Liberal rhetoric, only this time they have crossed the line and are using the photos of the dead to promote their sick cause. They don't give a damn about respect, honor, history and preservation, and they certianly don't have any problems with exploiting these people and their families to advance their sick Liberal garbage. This is the lowest of low to have such total and complete disrespect for the men, women and families of those brave people who have given their lives for this country. I would be very hard pressed to come up with anything lower and more vile than this type of abuse, and frankly I am sick and damn tired of it, and any decent human being should feel the same and let their concerns be known. I call for an immediate halt to this action and this lawsuit, and the immediate resignation of this worthless piece of human trash who is stinking up our university.

Thursday, April 28, 2005

Scare Tactics

Scare tactics are a favorite tool for the Liberals. I call it the: "The Sky Is Falling" syndrome. Liberals love to take non-issues and work them into a big frigging deal over nothing to help make another one of their meaningless points. They attempt to play on the weak and gullable to get them on their side of an argument, and sadly it usually works. The result is another Liberal following idiot who spouts off about an issue, and has absolutley no proof or facts to back themselves up. Anyway, I'm getting off story here today with that so here goes.

It seems that our esteemed mega-Liberal senator, Joe Biden, is playing the scare tactic game again in an attempt to scare moderate Republicans into abandoning their support for the "Nuclear Option" to stop the fillibuster regarding judicial nominees. You see, the Liberals cannot stand the fact that people are starting to take a stand and say enough is enough with their games. The Liberal Democrats for years have abused the fillibuster, not that both sides haven't used it, but the Liberal Democrats have taken it to an extreme, as usual. We have figured out their game by seeing what happens when they play the lets appoint leftist judges who only support our agenda game. We are now seeing the Liberal corruption of the judiciary in this country. We've witnessed judges making law from the bench that go against existing laws, as well as against everything the people want and need. We see our moral fibre being erroded on a daily basis by these judges who are siding with the radical left, and special interest minorities. We also know how hard it is to get these judgements changed once a judge lays down a decision.

There is an anal retentive thread in the judiciary, and the US legal system in general. This is that judges and prosecutors, the two most dangerous parts of the judiciary, have a serious problem admitting when they make a mistake. They do not understand that if they just admit they made an error, do the right thing and correct the situation before peoples rights are violated, that we would understand. But they have only one goal, and that is to save face at all costs. God forbid if anyone should surmise that the judiciary is capable of error. So it is critically important to get the right people installed into these positions of great and influential power.

Thats what scares the Liberals to death. Losing that power, control, and the ability to promote their sick twisted agenda via the legal system. So what they resort to is the fillibuster, to stall and wasted our time and money. Its their way of throwing a tantrum like sissys who aren't getting their way. They have the gall to blame Republicans and conservatives of having an agenda, and not allowing the nominees to be voted upon, when it is them who are holding up the works. So the Republicans are attempting to correct a situation that the Liberals have slanted in their favor to allow this type of Liberal game playing to happen. Republicans are trying to level the playing field so that nominees are voted on, and the fillibuster is only able to be used in extraordinary curcumstance as it should be.

So here comes Joe "I'm a Liberal" Biden spouting off his big mouth with threats of the big fallout if Republicans succeed in making the required changed and invoke the nuclear option. "The nuclear option was so named because it would cause widespread bedlam and dysfunction throughout the Senate." Biden says. NO! Liberal Joe, let me tell ya a secret, this situation already exists in the Senate because of Liberal Democrats. Want proof, OK, here is what the Democrats are planning: "Democrats are threatening to tie the Senate in procedural knots if the Republican leadership moves ahead with its plan to change Senate rules to stop Democrats from using the threat of a filibuster to block a vote on President Bush's judicial nominees. " Doesn't sound like the Republicans are causing any trouble. But the Democrats have all but admitted they will do what they do best, cause trouble so nothing gets done. So yeah Joe, its all about you, your Liberal buddies, and your selfless causes, and Liberal agendas. What you need Joe is a real job, although I don't know of any open positions for Liberal crybabys. So in the mean time, shut your pie hole, sit down, and actually do some work instead of being a disruptive Liberal a-hole. I know of some toilets that need cleaning, grab your bucket.

This isn't really political, but who cares. What the hell is all the ado about Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie?? Brad filed for divorce before he started dating, he is technically a free man. Whats the big frigging deal?? Christ these hollywood types rile me to no end. There just like Liberal Democrats, always trying to make a big frigging deal out of nothing. Oh, I forgot, they mostly are Liberal Democrats. So they are dating, who cares!! They are both single adults. I hope they are banging the crap out of each other and she swallows, good luck to them both. Its none of our damn business what they do, or who they date. Only a cluelss dolt with no life would even care. Get a life and get a real JOB!

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

A True Example Of A Liberal

Today again we are subjected to more Liberal anti-religion morons writing to impose their view on the rest of the world. This is nothing new, except that today was a doozie. There is a writer who tries to impress us with the amount of restrainit he has by coming right out and telling us how he has restrained from commenting on the issue until now. He should have continued to keep his Liberal mouth shut. He goes on to make note that the Supreme Court banned school prayer in 1963. I'll concede, this is an important point. First off, the Supreme Court is a federal governement entity. According to the constitution which these Liberals love to use to further their garbage, it correctly states that the governemnt shall make no law which prevents the people from practicing their religion nor abridge the rights of individuals to practice the same. For the Supreme Court to make such a ruling is a direct violation of the first amendment as it prohibits the individual citizen from practicing their religion as they see fit, and is therefore illegal and unenforceable. The justices are human, they make mistakes all the time, and this is one big example. They let themselves be berated into making the wrong decision by an athiest whore with a big mouth. Shit happens. Unfortnately, bad decisions by courts are very difficult to correct, and the Liberal anti-religion zealots use this to its full advantage. He also makes a vain attempt to pathetically show that the seperation clause is in the constitution by explaining that the document does not say exactly those words, but that it does say that "the governemnt shall not condone the establishment of religion." WRONG! If our Liberal imbecile did a little bit of research and dropped the biased agenda, he would know that it says: "Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of a religion." That is a big difference as condoning is nowhere near the same as establishing a religion by enacting law. Then this dolt continues to rip down some of the suggestions made my other writers in an attempt to find a middle ground. But as we all know with these Liberals, its their way or no way, so these suggestions would not do. Then he continues to show his anti-Christian bias by berating Christians in general and the concerns they have justifyably expressed recently. Then he issues his edict stating that religion of any faith has no place in public schools, or anywhere the education of children are concerned. To that I say Heil Hitler!! Your a commie dictator! We don't do dictator here jerkoff. As a final proof that the writer has a serious problem, he makes some sort of wierdo quote about not praying in his public buildings, and he won't think in our churches. First of all moron, they are not your buildings to make rules over, they belong to every single citizen in the community. Second its obvious your not thinking about anyone or any thing but 'you' wheither your in a church or not, or maybe its just that your brain is dead. In any event, its not about 'you' if you read your precious Bill of Rights you Liberals love to twist and manipulate to fit your twisted ideals, you'll see that its about each and every citizen, not just about 'you'. So think about that... if you are capable.

My second writing today will address the BP natural Gas Terminal. First off I would like to say good luck to BP, and I hope they get their terminal and its a huge success. Today the paper published an article describing how a New Jersy environmental group has jumped on the bandwagon, and is now sending their rants to the federal regulators on the matter. Basically, they, and DNREC need to keep their damn noses out of other peoples business. These tree hugger, fish kisser Liberals are nothing more than obstructionists hell bent on preventing this country from moving forward. They make assnine unsubstantiated claims of doom, gloom, and disaster at every turn. Frankly I'm getting sick of hearing their crap. The country and this region in particular are in dire need of this natural resource, and these jackals are holding up progress. Their complaints are laughable at best and never substantiated with any facts. Occasionally they will have a cronie Liberal pal spout off some ramblings that sound important and official, but basically say nothing. Claims, such that in the event of an explosion at the pier there would be a catastophic loss of life, come with no particulars or facts. If one surveys the area on the river, they would be hard pressed to make sense of the claims of immenent doom as the pier would be so far away from northern Delaware that anything more than some heat and broken glass from a complete and total explosion would be felt on Dealwares shore there. Then we need to worry about the little fishies who might be harmed in such an event, or maybe we should worry about the shrubs that may get burned up, and leave the birdies nowhere to land. Please, get a life people. Nature will survive, and the people will survive even if an event was even possible in the magnitutde that they allude to in their scare tactic stories. Bottom line is that these jackals need to stop obstructing commerce. The LP gas resources are needed, the location is perfect and safe, build the damn pier. The surrounding area would easily survive any mishap that may occur, and a disaster of the magnatude they describe is very highly unlikely to ever happen. So DNREC and other environuts, keep your noses out of business affairs, and go kiss a fish or hug a tree or something.

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

Let Them Fail!

Its fairly quiet today, just a few letters about the diploma issue. This is really a non-issue that the Liberals and their crap have made into a huge screwed up mess. Nothing new actually, they make a screwed up mess out of everything they attempt to "fix". Why they insist on coddling to kids who fail out of school because they are slackers and losers is the big question. There should be no multiple diplomas, there should only be one. If you do your work and stop worrying about partying, sex, trying to be 'cool', and drinking/drugs you pass and you get a diploma. If not, your failed and you take the year over again. Its as simple as that. This excuse that Bush's no child left behind plan forces them to pass every child even if they fail is bullcrap. The states can make legislation to address the issue, and are therefore exempt from the federal guidelines. So all that the state has to do is set up the correct guidelines that a student makes minimum grades throughout the year, and they graduate and get the diploma, otherwise they fail and they take the year over again until they do. This Liberal idiocy about not failing a child because they would be traumatized and made to feel inferior is a crock. Students who fail should be humiliated and made to feel the embarrasement of their inactions. Why, because they are failures. Otherwise they will never learn the correct path to take. Its far more damaging to keep giving them a gimmie and letting them think well I don't have to work, there is no way I can not pass. Believe it, they will utilize that loophole for all its worth, and in the end you have a lesser educated population of illiterates and lazy idiots. If you don't believe me, just go to public BBS's on line where a majority of younger generation kids hang out like a Honda Cars forum or Jessica Simpson forum, and look at the attrocious spelling and grammer. Get a clue people!!

One other thing I must comment on today. Ted Kennedy is the biggest piece of Liberal crap in the pot. He is the one that simply refuses to flush. This pathetic excuse for a man had to today get up in front of his Liberal Democrat buddies and rant on about it being the one year anniversary of Abu Graib. Big deal senator. No one cares about Abu Graib except you Liberal jackals who cannot let the damn issue go. You want to continue to bring it up, and attempt to tie the Bush administration to everything that happened there, which in the over all scheme of things was no big damn deal. Some humiliation events took place, and you jackals react like we were carving their internal organs out with a dull spoon and eating their eyeballs on ice cream. But do we hear one word of appall towards the murdering jackal Al-Zarqawi... hell no. That f'ing bastard was carving the heads off of innocents and blowing up Mosques killing innocents hand over fist, and not one word of indignation or outrage from you Liberal Democrats. But let our people do a little humiliation to get information and its the end of the modern world. Get a life Kennedy, your a complete and total disgrace to your family and to this country.

Monday, April 25, 2005

Someone Needs A History Lesson

We're back to again address this issue regarding the Bill of Rights and the anti-religious zelots. They insist on continuing to use the Bill of Rights as an argument to prove that they should be permitted to demand and recieve special treatment in preventing christians, or any other faith they find "offensive", from practicing their faith when ever and where ever they wish. They keep saying that the Bill of Rights was penned to protect the minority from the majority. NO! This is not correct. Nowhere in any writing of the Bill of Rights, or the Constitution, is it said that the purpose was to protect the minorities from the majorities. It doesn't even imply that. What it does say is that the Bill Of Rights was create by the founding fathers to speifically protect the individual citizen from the government. Specifically, in the case of the first ammendment, they state that congress shall make no law regarding the formation of a religion. This is very specific. Its says nothing about not allowing people to practice a religion on government property, or at government sponsored events, or anywhere for that matter. In fact those actions are specifically forbidden. Sponsoring an event is not congress making a law, it is non-binding on the individuals attending. Each individual is free to participate, or free not to participate for any reason, including that they do not believe, or they do not practice the faith being used at any given time. Its quite simple. They, the founding fathers, also went out of their way to specify in writing that government shall not prevent in any way, any individual from practicing their faith, IE: The free exercise therof. This too is quite clear. It means hands off!! To do otherwise is a violation of the individuals rights. The Bill of Rights is not a tool for either the majority or the minority to use to deny an individuals rights just because they find something offensive. Why is this not clear to some people unless they have an anti-_christian, anti-religious or some other self serving agenda?

Friday, April 22, 2005

Illegal Means Illegal...

There are a few annoying issues today to clean up. First of all are the whiners who are now being published in our favorite Liberal rag who are "appalled" that an Elsemere councilman would have the audacity to enforce the law. GASP!!! Councilman Jaremchuk is suggesting legislation to place on the Elsemere books a law that will allow any illegal immigrant encountered by police to be fined. I applaud the councilmans efforts and hope he is successful.

On the other side of the fence, are the Liberals who are in an uproar. They are bringing out all of the old keywords like discrimination, opression, appalled, unconstitutional, profiling, racist, and hostile. Oooohhhhh. Their lame argument, again, is to say that these "ILLEGALS" have rights just like a naturalized US citizen. Wrong! They are in the country illegally, they therefopre have no rights. That is they are breaking the law, IE: They are criminals. To simply fine them is far too leinient, they should be arrested, jailed, and then promptly deported. I don't want to hear this Liberal bullcrap about they are only here to seek a better life, and they are hard working individuals and now not only themselves, but other citizens of the community are living in fear. Yeah... stir that pot. We are back to the old Liberal playbook, and lets see which one they are using today.... AH! The sky is falling the sky is falling, my favorite. Legal citizens of the community have no reason to fear. If they are legal, they will have their papers and ID in order and the police move on. On the other hand, for those who are here illegally, the Liberal argument holds no water. Nothing new here. Buy any one of these illegals can go through the very leinient and free process of registering, getting the required papers, and working to become a citizen legally. If this is not acceptable, then get out before we legally throw you out. Its that simple. So stop with the Liberal bleeding heart rehtoric, its sickening. The law is the law they always say and the law must be enforced. Well then start practicing what you preach Liberals, or does the law not apply in this case because it screws up your adgenda?

In another opinion published, we still have some moron spouting off about the Religious Right secularists, and how people that are having their rights to freely express and practice their religion violated are just right wing extremests. Screw you Jim, your the worse kind of Liberal imbecile. You sit there and write how no one is shoving anything down anyones throat, and your wrong. That is exactly what is happening. The complaining family is not simply expressing a concern as someone wrote, they want action taken to completely stop the christians from practicing their religion. That IS shoving it down someones throat. The complaining family is wrong, and so would any other family who did not know how to simply not participate and ignore that in which they do not wish to paticipate or believe in, but wanted to impose a no religion zone simply because they didn't like what was happening. Thats narrowminded Liberalisim, and its is wrong. Again, in true Liberal fashion, the writer tries to bring up the non-existant Seperation clause again. Give it up Jim, your a bigot and a narrow minded anti-christian Liberal.

We did have one letter writer start with the pissing and moaning about how so called conservatives are enacting laws in favor of corporations. They list as proof such legislation as restricting Class Action Lawsuits, Caps on Malpractice Awards, and Limits on Gun Manufacturer Liability. Well mister Liberal, these law changes were all much needed and required. Not because fundamentally there was anything wrong with the original laws, but because Liberal morons like you misused and abused the system so much, that it got to the point where action had to be taken to make the system fair and balanced again. If the Liberals and other lawsuit zealots would have used some common sense instead of greed, then this situation would not exist. So don't come crying now that you've probably lost a revenue source or a get rich quick path, and try to blame it on the Conservatives. Try looking in the mirror.

We also have one lost soul who is now blaming the right wingers for attempting to change the rules when it comes to the appointment of judicial nominees. She writes that the debate required to scrutinize the candidate should be allowed to happen, and that this would be a good thing, but then accuses the right of trying to change the rules to sidestep this important part of the process. WRONG! Another Liberal spouting off before they have any of the facts. Again, nothing new. If she bothered to do some research, she would find that its the Liberals and Democrats who are the ones stalling, and preventing exactly what she thinks is a good thing from happening. The Liberals and Democrats are the ones fullibustering and holding up the process. Its their sissy whiny way of saying I don't like to eat my veggies so I'm going to stand here and stomp my feet until I get my way. The Liberals are so afraid that good level headed smart people will actually get appointed to the judiciary, and that they will lose an important area of control that they use relentlessly to progress their twisted ideals, they they are doing anything they can to slow down and/or stop the process. What the Republicans are attempting to do is simply stop the stalling and get down to business. They want the debates and the appointments to move forward. This cannot happen with the cry baby Liberals using the fillibuster to stall and piss and moan to the point where nothing is getting done. Then these same Liberal jackals will stand up and accuse the current administration of doing nothing while they had the power, and use that as an argument to convince the gullable to vote for them. I don't think so.

As for regular news articles the News Urinal is trying to make Tom Carper look like an environmentalists hero. In short, he's nothing but an obstructionist. He is holding up the appointment of a well qualified candidate to the Environmental Protection Agency because he didn't get some nonsense report from the department. This is more Liberalisim at work, and is indicative of how they operate as outlined in the above blog article regarding the appointment of judges. The Liberals always have to have their way which is typically dangerous, destructive or anti-progressive in nature, or they start playing their little pouting games in an attempt to get their way. Again, they are stalling and holding up progress because of their infantile antics. Grow up Tom and appoint the man to the damn position, and stop stalling around and holding up progress to gain favors for your personal agenda. After all, you don't want to catch up with Joe Biden in being the most Liberal moron to represent Delaware now do you?

One last note I forgot to mention yesterday. I see that Acela is now grounded until June due to basically shitty parts quality in the braking system. I'm glad Amtrack is doing the right thing and grounding the fleet even though they know it will hurt already strained revenues. My only advice is this.... stop buying junk trains for millions and billion from other countries! This country at one time had the most effective and complete mass transit infastructures in the world. We had the biggest, most efficient rail service infastructure on the planet, and we foolishly let it go to waste in favor of irresponsible, inefficient, destructive and wasteful trucking. This was the biggest mistake this country has made in modern times was to let our rail infastructure be systematically erroded and dismantled. Now we have trucks burning copious amounts of fuel to haul a single trailer of goods, they are a serious and deadly hazard on our highways, they are destructive to our highways and their infastructure and pay nothing for its upkeep and repair, and they are far from cost effective. We've exchanged this for one large motor or two pulling hundreds of trailers of goods, off and away from our highways running on their own super efficient highway of rails, who would not be endangering every driver on the already congested roads, who would not be destroying the highway infastructure and not paying a dime to repair the damage they made that we as taxpayers are paying for via our high taxes, and who are the most cost effective means on the planet for moving goods and people. Trucking should be restricted to the fullest extent possible, and rail transportation should be supported fully.

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Good Little Boys

Before I get into my writing for the day, I'd like to comment on the Jane Fonda incident. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! That guy spitting in her face was funnier than stepped in dog crap. OK, now tht that is behind me, I'll move on.

First I'd like to say a word or two to the Liberals and other jackals stalling on John Boulton. Vote the man into the damn job. He is the best qualified man for the position. He is tough, he is gruff, and thats exactly what those spinless dolts at the UN need is someone who has the guts to step on a few toes and get things done. These damn Liberal jackals keep harping on non-issues and making a big deal out of absolutely nothing. They're looking for a softy, a Liberal touchey feeley do gooder to put into that position. Someone who they can control and manipulate to fit their agenda. That is crap, and they've done this time and again when it comes to appointing the right people to an important postion of power. They him and haw and stall and complain when a good solid unbiased candidate is suggested, and dilly around until they get one of their hymie lackeys into the position. Then we have our rights violated and freedoms curtailed by these Liberal dolts making law from the bench for example. Vote the man IN!

Today, as is typical to form, the News Urinal does up a huge front page article about our Delaware representatives and how their travel is so important and therefore justified. Please, spare me the rhetoric and bullcrap. What this Liberal piece of crap is doing is getting out ahead of the pack and attempting to beautify and justify needless spending made by such losers as the king of Liberals, Joe Biden, who ranks very high in the amount of money he wastes on needless trips paid for by the taxpayers. I believe old Liberal Joe ranks about 26th or something out of 582. Thats pretty rank if you ask me. Then they go off on this tangent trying to paint Biden as an every day guy who has a heart and wanted to be with the soldiers, and he bathed with them using his bucket and stood around in the buff. Spare me.

Why would the News Urinal do such a thing. Because the Liberal Democrats and a few spineless Republicans are on a witch hunt with Tom Delay about a few trips he took which were perfectly legal and exactly the same as hundreds of other trips take by Liberal Democrats themselves such as Barbara Boxer, Stephanie Jones, Nancy Pelosi, and Ted Kennedy. No body is ready to hang those Liberals Democrats out to dry. So the News Urinal comes up with this rediculous article and tried to explain away the multitude of trips taken by Biden, Carper, and Castle and attempts to make them all sound very legitimate and worthwhile. They even supply a nice little listing grouped together by representative showing that these trips were all on the up and up.

Interestingly, they are all in exotic locations, and in many instances they took their spouse. They tried to explain this away by saying that it was the sponsors choice as to location, and they pick such places so that those attending can get away from the pressures and distractions of their daily lives. PUKE!! What a pile of crap. You don't need to send these jackals to Cancun, Aspen, and Spain. Try Atlantic City or Dallas for christ sake, and save a few thousand bucks a pop. Another interesting point, is that if one looks at the neat and orderly listing they have prepared, not one of those trips were listed as paid for by taxpayers. Thats the list I want to see. I want to see the huge list and expendatures that we the people are being forced to pay, and where they are going and for what alleged business. I'll bet my dime that this list would incriminate every damn one of the Liberals. It also does not address any of the alleged off limits type of trips that they are badgering Tom Delay about. They only list the supposed "allowed" sponsored trips. How the hell is the average reader to know the difference anyway. So bottom line is, the article is a smokescreen and basically useless as it provides no information or proof that Biden, Carper or Castle are any more, or any less guilty than Tom Delay. It will smoke over the brain dead Liberals which is the easy part. By many working brain conservatives will see it for what it is, bunk.

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

Let It Go....

Well, today we have another hapless dolt who insists on continuing the argument about the differences between Christians and Jews. Basically in the article the writer is trying to compare the Christians who are standing up for their rights in Sussex county and complaining that Christians today are not martyrs. Where do these people get their information from, and why do they think they can write such garbage and expect anyone with an ounce of common sense to say yeah I can see this mindless point exactly. There are some serious similarities between what happened back in 70CE and what is happening today in regards to the Christians. These zealots just cannot come right out and start killing and slaughtering Christians these days, that would be too obvious and "appalling". But its not like what they are doing today in their off handed sneaky way is not the same, by any stretch of the imagination. Back in 70CE when the Romans were publicly persecuting the Christians and actively went out of their way to hunt down and persecuted the Christians, they were not only singling them out because of their faith, but they were slaughtering them for no other reason. But simply being slughtered does not make one a Martyr.

What we have today is minority faiths who cannot accept the fact that there are other faiths in the world and they all have the same right in the USA to pratice their faith when ever and where ever they wish. These minority faiths are so narrow minded that its basically their way (IE: Their religion), or the highway. Today we have a systematic erosion of one faiths rights (the Christians) in the USA. Anything and everything Christian is slowly being eradicated from public life, by abuse of the courts and legal system. IE: Legal discrimination based on faith. Claims of indoctrination, claims of the violation of the minorities rights, and the ever present and ever bogus seperation clause arguments are brought up at the mere mention of anything Christian, but amazingly all is silent when any other faith like say one of Islamic faith mentions or practices same. So yes, christians today are being singled out and persecuted, the same as they were back when the Romans were in power.

Christians today are not being murdered outright, but they and their faith are slowly being violated and systematically, symbolically murdered each time they attempt to participate in anything related to their faith. So yes, todays Christians are Martyrs the same as their bretheren who lived and died back in 70CE. Its time for these other faiths to back off and start practicing what they preach, getting along, being tolerant, and accepting others from all walks of life. Anything else labels them for what they are, hypocrites.

Another subject I just have to touch on today is a prime example of how ridiculous our State government can get and how lost they are when it comes to prioritizing issues. Today we were treated to an article about how the state house of representatives have been wasting time debating, and have decided on, which insect to name as the State bug. Yes, the little Stonefly is the hero of the state. What a pathetic waste of our time and money. Its a Liberal thing.....

We did have one very laughable letter to the editor today. Some idiot wants us to stop sinking old ships and to raise all of the sunken warships and other military and marinetime scuttle to preserve the "exceedingly wonderful and beautiful" oceans from the decay of these relics. These natural resources are being contaminiated and destroyed. GASP!!!! The sky is falling the sky is falling........... What this total idiot does not realize is that these old ships and other equipment make new habitats for undersea wildlife to use to florish and grow. In contrast to his "the sky is falling" rehtoric, quite the opposite results from the process of scuttling old ships and equipment at sea. Again, another bleeding heart moron Liberal spouting off before they did an ounce of research on the matter. They're probably imagining a ship full of debris and garbage and old fuel and oil being lowered to the bottom to leak and seep chemicals for years to come. If they did an ounce of research into the matter, they would know that these old ships are stripped and cleaned of anything that may remotely be harmful to any marine life, or the marine environment before they are sunk. After they are sunk they provide excellent artificial habitats for marine life to nest, feed and flourish for years to come. Somehow people with working brains will not be "Outraged" by this at all.

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

What Ever!!

Today we still have the non-Christians harping on the tollerance issue. We have an entire corner on the opinion page devoted to a block of bullcrap written by Samuel Horowitz (Shemp?). Again they ramble on about how they as a minority should not be subjected to the will of the majority in regards to any issue, particularly religion. Well Sammy, thats not whats happening so get over it. Where in the hell did this the minority rights trump majority rights bullcrap argument come from? AH! Let me start by saying I've never had any problem with people of the jewish faith, and usually heald them in high regard as compared to other demographic groups. Anyway the point is that this minority vs majority argument is bullcrap. In a our democracy and under our Constitution the will of the majority nor the minority takes preceidence. If this were not the case, we'd be living under the rule of John "I'm a Liberal traitor" Kerry. Shudder..... thats a scary thought this early in the morning. Yes, if that were true, that the minorities rights trump the majorities rights then the election would have been argued away and W would have lost because a majority of Americans were 'Intollerant" to the desires and needs of the minority. Enough with the intollerance bullcrap. We all have the right to practice our respective religions where ever we wish, (and this includes governement property which we all own), and those who do not wish to participate have the right not to do so. There is no indoctrination here, no one is forcing anything down anyones throat. Its just the non-Christians being intollerant, nothing new. One letter writer got it right in their written, and suprisingly published, opinion in which they state exactly my point. We all have the same right to participate or not to participate and its the non-Christians in this case who are obviously wrong, and intollerant, and are trying to force their will on the majority. Again, it does not work that way. But we all know, money is power, and many different people have a ton of money, and many are lawyers and politicians, and lawyers and politicians basically run this country. This is a dangerous situation for this country to be in at this time, and its becoming a danger to the very fabric of our socitey. As I wrote in a seperate article in this blog, this division of the peoples with all of these petty issues, and the attempt by the minority to appease every little minority gripe will be the demise of this country.

The second item I'll talk about today is Norm Lockman. I never liked Norm, but there we go, a know nothing racist Liberal gets a huge front page write up on todays News Urinal. This is big news for Liberals when one of their bigger trouble makers croaks off. I'm not really suprised given that the News Urinal is such a Liberal piece of garbage run by the worse Liberals in the area. So they sit there praising old Norm, and I'm not impressed at the least. He won a Pulitzer for contributing to a very racist piece with a group in Boston. Wow, what a highlight to ones career. They state that Norm loved getting people to think and riling up the masses. Basicaly, he simply stirred the racial pot. I wrote to him on several occasions and reamed him out for being such a Liberal, and a racist. His articles were not informative at all, many were in fact inflamatory in nature, very slanted, and bordered on outright falsehoods. But old Norm had to get his racist point across, and he had found the perfect outlet, a Liberal rag like the News Urinal. What ever.... I say no loss, good riddance. One down, how many to go?

Monday, April 18, 2005

America's Demise

I recieved this as an e-mail attachment from a good friend who lives out west. Its pretty good and an eye opener as well. Its a good example of how twisted and bassackwards things have gotten in the country, and a good incentive to get up and fight to stop the downward spiral.

America's Demise: We all know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was animmigration-overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled tocapacity by many of American's finest minds and leaders. A brilliantcollege professor named Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latestbook, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it wouldmarch across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The AmericanDream. Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up andgave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of theUnited States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. ArnoldToynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'" "Here is how they do it," Lamm said: "Turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation cansurvive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. "The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate arehistories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.' Canada, Belgium, Malaysia,Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities pressfor autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided.Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans." Lamm went on: "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanationis out of bounds. "We could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American,we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.'" Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities." "Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school." "My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population." "My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity.I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other." "A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People under value the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to over come two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. "E. Pluribus Unum" -- From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'unum,'we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo." "Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits ~ make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate." "Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them." In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said, "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book." There was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominouscloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today. Every discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America - take note of California and other states - to date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery, "and "Ignorance is strength." Governor Lamm, walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The AmericanDream.

Friday, April 15, 2005

Mr Bendover.... Credit Card Bank Here.... Drop'em!

Thanks again to the Credit Card industry for sticking it to the public by finally getting the Bankruptcy Reform bill passed. Just bend over everyone and let them shove it in hard and dry. This legislation now curtails the rights of the individual in that they now have a severely restricted ability to file for bankruptcy. More thanks to our a-hole Liberal senators, and all around back stabbers Joe Biden and Tom Carper. Thanks guys for selling us out to your special interests. Not that I've ever voted for Liberal laughing stock Joe Biden anway, but remind me not to ever vote for you again either way. Jerks. Now, people who are trapped in a no way out situation are going to be required to continue to pay on their debts, instead of having the slate wiped clean. OK, so let me try real hard to figure to common sense out of this statement. You have a person, who is decimated financially, has no means to pay, be it due to Divorce, Illness, Job Loss or what ever, and theses idiots are going to still require you to pay back part of the debt? One question.... with what?? Frigging sand?? Whats wrong with this picture???? I'll tell you whats wrong. You have credit card companies playing games with peoples finances, getting them into trouble, and then taking away their only means of relief because of their own actions. Credit card companies are not held accountable at all for a problem they cause and prepetuate.

How, lets count the ways. They agressively market to everyone, particularly to younger irresponsible clients, the gullable and the poor. They are the only business in the world allowed to do business with an open ended contract thats open on their end only. By this I mean they can change the rates and terms of the contract "At Will" and at their descretion without the other partys permission. Its you either accept the changes or we'll close your frigging account, but by the way, you still must pay at the assnine rate we've set for you. Sorry, when I learned business law in college a contract was a contract. 4 Corners rule, if its not within the 4 corners of the original document it cannot be changed on a whim at a later date without nullifying the original contract in its entirety, at the agreement of both parties to the contract. What this does is enables these companies to abuse their customers as they see fit.

If we wrote to our bank and told them as of the 30th of this month the rate on our car loan will be adjusted to 1% they'd not only rupture a disc laughing, but probably sue us blind. But this is the same difference! So what happens in the real world is a client signs up for an account, promisses to pay each month and the rate is 6.9%. Not bad, they have this calculated out and can afford the payments, even if they max the card out at the current stated rates. This is good for say 3 months where for some unknown reason some blockhead at the bank decides to snoop into your business and sees a 6 year old 30 day late payment back when you had a car accident. He promptly bumps your rate up to 26.9% as you are now considered a high risk. The same thing happens if you approach your credit limit. They give you a damn credit limit of say $2000 but if you attempt to use it, and your balance due approaches that limit, they somehow surmise this to be a "risk", and your rate pops up to double digits. What the hell is the sense in that??

What this does is make the repayment of the debt harder for the client and increases the likelyhood that the bank will NOT get paid. This happens all the time. Make one late payment, legitimate mistake or not, and up goes the rate. Have one financial crisis, up goes the rate to userous amounts. Then when you fail financially, they start pissing and moaning about the rising number of bankruptcies, and want their brown nosing butt licking cronies (you know who you are Joe Biden & co.) in Washington to fix the problem by legislating the clients rights out of existance. They brought this crisis onto themselves, they are the ones who need to be reeled in and hard. Their contract needs to be a fixed closed end contract. If a client signs up for 9% thats what they get for life unless the CLIENT closes the account and applies for and opens another at a different rate. This open ended contract crap is just that, a bunch of crap. If a client wants a credit card, they should be required to go to a lending institution, bank or what ever of their own accord, apply, and be processed as if they were applying for a $25,000 car loan. They should be strictly scruitinized, an appropriate rate offered, and the client given an opportunity to reject the deal up front, not after they run up a few thousand in debt, and the rate is slammed up to the ceiling. Marketing in colleges and libraries etc should be banned.

My recomendation to the general public is lets stick it up their asses. Pay off your existing cards and then lock them in a safe. Apply for no more credit cards until they change the rules or they are also reeled in by laws and made to play fair. A nice little game I like to play is to fill out those annoying solicitaions I get in the mail with bogus info, and write across the form. I'll take the card if the rate is permanently fixed at 5% and can never ever be changed. So far none have take me up on my offer, or advertised that they are changing their contract structures, but it is fun trying. At least it wastes their postage and time.

Thursday, April 14, 2005

Oh, That Word Tollerance Again

Earlier in the week there was an article which told about several families in the southern part of the state who are sueing the school district because they allow people to use and express religion in their school activities. GASP!! These narrow minded Liberals just don't get it. Freedom in this country means, they are "Free" to ignore and/or not participate in anything religious they do not believe in or wish to participate in at the school. Maybe they could just say one of their own prayers or something? No, that would be too easy. On the other hand, all of the other people in the school are also "Free" to practice what religion they see fit. Its quite simple a theory really, and would work quite well if the Liberals would let it work. But this is too much to ask. What this "Minority" group wants, is to violate the rights of the majority of the people in that area so they can feel a part of the community and schools etc. Where is the fairness in that. They have no right to demand that everyone else be banned from doing something just because they don't believe in it. What that amounts to is pure communisim. But today we get some jackal writing to the editor about how because the majority of the people in that area want to be able to practice some religion in and around the school, and they are justifyably angry at this assult on their freedoms, that they are aghast that these so called religious and all forgiving people are not more "Tollerant" of these families feelings. Well, it doesn't work that way in a Democratic society. In this case a majority of the people wish to participate in prayer and/or song at the school. So the minority who don't should be the ones practicing "Tollerance" and stop trying to force their way on everyone else. Then the writer goes into this old Liberal standby, the Seperation Clause. Well, Liberals, this Seperations Clause is just like Santa Cluse, it does not exist. Stop tossing it around! There is NOWHERE in the Constitution anything that says there must be a complete seperation between anything government and anything and everything church/religious. If you engage your brains, if you have any, its quite clear. It says that the Congress Shall Make NO Law Establishing a Religion. What pat of that is not perfectly clear?? If a school board has no problem with people freely saying prayers before a game or singing hymns after class thats NOT Congress Making A Law Establishing A Religion. But while we are on this Blog, lets use the Constitution the way it was written. The next line clearly states that the Government shall never do anything to prevent people from freely practicing their religion. This is proof positive that these Liberal jackals are way off the mark, as usual, with their so called Seperation Clause. In fact, for them to get any judge, who is an agent of the state or federal governements appointed to uphold and rule on the law, to forbid any people from practicing their religion anywhere, IS a violation of the law and should be disallowed. So letter writer, go back to sleep, get a life and try reading the Constitution again and getting it right. As for you Liberals, stop trying to violate our rights so your minority can impose their will on the rest of us. IE: Get a Life!!


Hello, and welcome to my personal BLOG. I'm a 50 year old white male, college educated (Before Liberalisim took over the educational system), a Replublican and conservative. Why did I decide to create this Blog. My local news paper, the Wilmington News Journal, unaffectionately called The Wilmington News Urinal, is the most left sided Liberal rag in the area. Normally this would not be a major big deal, except that this is the largest and only paper in this area. Yes, local residents do have access to The Wall Street Journal and USA Today. Although the latter is just another Liberal rag as well. Over the years I have read far too many misleading and destructive articles and public commentary that put down solid conservative ideals, promote the Liberal agenda, and basically send the wrong message to the gullable masses. I've finally reached a point where I've decided to do something about this unacceptable situation. A BLOG seemed to be the answer, provided the existence of this BLOG becomes known to the masses in the area, and they start reading it and getting the truth for a change. Some may ask, why don't I just write letters to the Editor expressing my point. I have done this, and on numerous occasions, only to be ignored, and therefore never published. The truth will do no good if its not published. So here I am, and this is my BLOG. I will try very hard, as time permits, to address specific articles or opinions on a dailty basis. The Blog entries will be by the date the item appered in the paper. Thanks for reading, and if your a whiny Liberal jerk, and hate what your reading here because the truth hurts, then why don't you go screw yourself, and while your doing that try practicing what you call "Tollerance" and get over it. I will tell it like it is however, so for the weak of heart, you better prepare yourself for a little swearing once in a while and subject matter that Liberals deem off limits, like blacks, religion and Liberals to be addressed head on.